دوره 8، شماره 27 - ( 1-1396 )                   سال8 شماره 27 صفحات 122-85 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahabadi A, Samari H. Effective Factors on High-Tech Exports: Using Simultaneous Equations System. jemr 2017; 8 (27) :85-122
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-990-fa.html
شاه آبادی ابوالفضل، ثمری هانیه. عوامل موثر بر صادرات مبتنی بر فناوری برتر با استفاده از روش سیستم معادلات همزمان. تحقیقات مدلسازی اقتصادی. 1396; 8 (27) :85-122

URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-990-fa.html

1- دانشگاه بوعلی سینا ، shahabadia@gmail.com
2- دانشگاه بوعلی سینا
چکیده:   (6709 مشاهده)

صادرات مبتنی بر فناوری¬های نوین همیشه به عنوان یک مزیت رقابتی مطرح بوده است و حاکی از پویایی و انسجام اقتصادی کشور و جایگاه ویژه آن در بازارهای جهانی است. کمبود نوآوری یکی از عوامل اصلی موثر بر صادرات با فناوری برتر در کشورها است و تا زمانی¬که نوآوری و آموزش¬های استفاده از علوم و دانش ارتقا نیابد، بازدهی و کارایی سایر عوامل تولید در سطح نازل باقی می¬ماند. از اینرو، هدف این مطالعه بررسی تاثیر نوآوری بر صادرات مبتنی بر فناوری برتر در کشورهای منتخب درحال¬توسعه و توسعه¬یافته طی دوره زمانی 2013-2007 با رهیافت داده های تابلویی و با روش تخمینی معادلات همزمان است. برآورد مدل عمومی بیان می¬دارد در کشورهای درحال توسعه، ضریب شاخص جهانی نوآوری و انباشت جریان ورودی سرمایه¬گذاری مستقیم خارجی و تولید ناخالص داخلی، مثبت و معنادار و ضریب شاخص حکمرانی، مثبت و بی¬معنا است و در کشورهای توسعه¬یافته، ضرایب متغیرهای شاخص جهانی نوآوری، انباشت جریان ورودی سرمایه¬گذاری مستقیم خارجی، تولید ناخالص داخلی و شاخص حکمرانی، مثبت و معنادار است. لذا به¬منظور بهبود محیط نوآورانه لازم است در سیاست¬گذاری¬ها از رویکرد اقتصاد منابع¬محور به اقتصاد دانش¬محور از طریق همسوسازی بیشتر سیاست¬های کلان اقتصادی با سیاست¬های علمی- آموزشی و پژوهشی به¬منظور تقویت ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه و منطبق بر نیاز حال حاضر تولیدات صنایع مبتنی بر دانش و فناوری تغییر ایجاد شود.

متن کامل [PDF 2683 kb]   (4016 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: كاربردي | موضوع مقاله: تجارت و مالیه بین الملل
دریافت: 1394/4/22 | پذیرش: 1395/6/27 | انتشار: 1396/2/27

فهرست منابع
1.  Aaboen, L., Lindelo, P., Von Kochc, C. and Lofsten, H. (2006). Corporate governance and performance of small high-tech firms in Sweden. Technovation, 26(8); 955–968. [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.07.004]
3.  Aaby, Nils-Erik, and Stanley F. Slater. (1989). Management influences on export performance: A review of the empirical literature 1978-1988. International Marketing Review, 6(4):7-26.
4.  Al-Marhubi, F. (2004). The determinants of governance: A cross-country ananlysis, Journal of Contemporary Economic Policy, 2(3); 394-406.
5.  Baltaji, B. (2011). Econometrics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
6.  Barney, J. (2001). Is the Resource-based View a useful perspective for Strategic Management research? Yes, Academy of Management Review, 26, 41-56.
7.  Barro, R. (1996). Democracy and growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1); 11-27.
8.  Belderbos, R., Duvivier, F. and Wynen, J. (2010). Innovation and export competitiveness: Evidence from flemish firms, Availble at: www.ondernemerschap.be/123.pdf
9.  Chadha, A. (2009). Product cycles, innovation, and exports: A study of Indian pharmaceuticals. World Development. 37(9); 1478–1483. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.01.002]
11.  Chen, Y. and Sappington, D. E. M. (2009). Designing input prices to motivate process innovation, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3); 390–402.
12.  Edwards, L. and Alves, P. (2005). South Africa export performance: Determinats of export supply, Working Paper, School of Economics University of Cape Town. Available at http:// www.worldbank.org/afr/wps/wp95.pdf
13.  Fu, D., Wu, Y. and Tang, Y. (2010). Does innovation matter for Chinese High-Tech exports: A firm level analysis? The University of Western Australia. Available at http:// ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/30012.html.
14.  Feyzpour, M. A., Dehghanpour, M. R. and Talaie, Gh. (2011). Regional diffrences and technological levels in Iran's industry outputs. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 44(4); 129-146.
15.  Gujarati, D. and Porter, D. (2008). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Education.
16.  Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K. and Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International of Journal Production Economics, 133, 662-676. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014]
18.  Hashi, I. and Stojcic, N. (2012). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy.
19.  Hsiao, F. S. T. and Hsiao, W. M. C. (2006). FDI, exports, and GDP in East and Southeast Asia-panel data versus time-series causality analyses. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(6); 1082–1106. [DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2006.09.011]
21.  Hulton, C. (1996). Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important than how much you have. NBER Working paper 5847.
22.  Ismail, N. W. (2013). Innovation and High-Tech trade in Asian countries, International Conference on Recent Developments in Asian Trade Policy and Integration, 20th and 21st February, 2013. At Kuala Lumpur Teaching Centre, the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus.
23.  Keeble, D. and Wilkinson, F. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe, Geo Journal, 56(2); 167-169.
24.  Lall, S. (2000). Export performance and competitiveness in the Philippines. QEH Working Paper. No. 49, 1-24.
25.  Law, S. H., Azman-Saini, W. N. W. and Zubaidi Baharumshah, A. (2010). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: International evidence, Economic Modeling, 27(5); 1079–1089.
26.  Lawrence, M. (1998). High-Tech industries drive global economic activity, National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/issuebrf/sib98319.htm
27.  Mason, C. and Wagner, K. (1994). Innovation and the skill mix: Chemicals and engineering in Britain and Germany. National Institute Economic Review, 148(1); 61-72. [DOI:10.1177/002795019414800106]
29.  Mehregan, N. and Dehghanpour, M. R. (2011). Impact of R&D and FDI on Iran's Hi-Tech industries (1360-86). Journal of Knowledge and Technology, 1(4); 59-79.
30.  Mirzababazadeh, S. (2008). Evaluting the impact of domestic and foreign R&D accumulation on non-oil export, Iran case study. Master Thesis, Economics & Social science Faculty, Bu-ali Sina University.
31.  Mohammadzadeh, P. and Sojudi, S. (2011). Survey of factors affecting Iran's enterprises. Journal of Executive Management, 3(6); 127-152.
32.  Oketch, M. O. (2006). Determinants of human capital formation and economic growth of African countries, Economics of Education Review, 25(5); 554–564.
33.  Oura, M. M., Zilber, S. N. and Lopes, E. L. (2015). Innovation capacity, international experience and export performance of SMEs in Brazil, International Business Review, In Press, Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593115300445
34.  Pilat, D. and Lee, F. (2001). Productivity growth in ICT producing and ICT-using industries: A source of growth differentials in the OECD? , STI Working Paper, OECD. Available at www.ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaaa/2001-4-en.html [DOI:10.1787/774576300121]
36.  Poeter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creation and sustain, superior performance, Free Press, New York. Available at http://www.isc.hbs.edu/firm-competitve.htm
37.  Porter, M. E. (2003). Building the microeconomic foundations of competitiveness in the global competitiveness report 2002-2003, World Economic Forum, New York: Oxford University Press.
38.  Pourjavan, A., Shahabadi, A., Ghrbanejad, M., and Amiri, H. (2014). The impact of natural resource abundance on selected countries performance: GMM approach. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 4(16); 1-32.
39.  Rasiah, R. (2003). Foreign ownership, technology and electronics exports from Malaysia and Thailand, Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5); 785–811.
40.  Sandua, S. and Ciocanel, B. (2014). Impact of R&D and Innovation on high - tech export. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 80-90. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00450-X]
42.  Sara, S. T. and Jackson, H. F. (2012). Role of innovation in Hi-Tech-exports of a nation, International journal of Business and Management, 7(7); 85-93.
43.  Seyoum, B. (2004). The role of factor conditions in high-technology exports: An empirical examination, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1); 145–162.
44.  Shahabadi, A. and Pouran, R. (2010). Study and evaluating of the brain drain on Iran's economic growth directly and indirectly. Iranian Journal of Trade Study, 14(55); 1-46.
45.  Shahabadi, A. and Sadeghi, H. (2011). Evaluating the competitvness of OPEC countries: By emphasize on innovation-base factors. Journal of Science & Technology Parks and Incubators, 8(29); 3-15.
46.  Shahabadi, A. and Mirzababazadeh, S. (2008). Evaluating the R&D process in Iran's non-oil exports. Presented in the first conference of national economic development activities, since 25/12/2008 till 26/12/2008, Located in the Central Organization of Payam Noor University.
47.  Singh, D. A. and Gaur, A. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India, Journal of International Management, Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2233199
48.  Tarek, K. and Ravi, S. (2013). Management of technology: the key to competitiveness and wealth creation, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi, India.
49.  Tebaldi, E. (2011). The determinate of High-Technology exports: A panel data analysis, International Atlantic Economic Society, Available at http:// ideas.repec.org/a/kap/atlecj/v39y2011i4p343-353.html‎
50.  Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1); 687-703. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001]
52.  Vaez, M., Tayebi, S. K., and Ghanbari, A. (2007). R&D expenditure effect on Hi-Tech industries' value added. Quarterly Journal of Economics Review, 4(4); 53-72.
53.  Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2); 190–207. [DOI:10.2307/1880689]
55.  Wang, Z. X. and Wang, Y. Y. (2014). Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6); 2824–2831.
56.  Wu, J., Li, S. and Samsell, D. (2012). Why some countries trade more, some trade less, some trade almost nothing: The effect of the governance environment on trade flows, International Business Review, 21(2); 225–238.
57.  Annual Global Innovation Index Report, Available at:
58. www.globalinnovationindex.org
59.  Annual Economic Freedom Index Report, Availble at:
60. www.freetheworld.com
61.  Civil Liabilites and Political Rights, Available at:
62. www.freedomhouse.org
63.  National Science Fundation (NSF), Available at: www.NSF.gov
64.  WDI (2015). Available at: www.Worldbank.org.

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به فصلنامه تحقیقات مدلسازی اقتصادی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Economic Modeling Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb