Volume 10, Issue 36 (6-2019)                   jemr 2019, 10(36): 195-234 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zaroki S. Effect of Government Size on Environmental Pollution in Iran. jemr 2019; 10 (36) :195-234
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1815-en.html
University of Mazandaran , sh.zaroki@umz.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3047 Views)
Given the importance of the issue and the undeniable role of the environment in the community's life, in this research, it is attempted to test the hypothesis of the relationship between the government size and composition of government expenditure (Current and developmental) on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran during 1971-2016 based on autoregressive distributed lag approach. To better explain, the above hypothesis is based on two parts of production (production industries) and Consumable (household, commercial, general; and transportation) has been investigated. Long-run results show that despite the fact that government size does not affect carbon dioxide emissions; the current cost ratio and developmental spending ratio of government respectively have a direct (undesirable) and reverse (favorable) effect on carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, the developmental spending ratio of government in both production and consumable sectors has a reverse effect on the carbon dioxide emissions of these sectors. However, the current cost ratio of government in both sectors does not have a significant effect. Energy intensity has a direct effect on carbon dioxide emissions in general format, and although the energy intensity of the production sector has no significant effect on the carbon dioxide emission ratio in this section but in the consumable sector, energy intensity is associated with direct (undesirable) effects on carbon dioxide emissions.
Full-Text [PDF 3739 kb]   (688 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: انرژی، منابع و محیط زیست
Received: 2019/02/15 | Accepted: 2019/09/2 | Published: 2019/09/24

1. Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.090]
2. Akhtari, A. & Taiebnia, A. (2014). The estimation of co2 storage in form of sustainable ramsey model in Iranian economy. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 4(16), 33-71. {in Persian}
3. Amadeh, H., Shakeri, A. & Mohammadeyan, F. (2012). Government size, Government quality and environmental quality: Case study of OECD and OIC countries. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 1(2), 27-60. {in Persian}
4. Bernauer, T. & Koubi, V. (2013). Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution. Public Choice, 156(3-4), 593-609. [DOI:10.1007/s11127-012-9916-1]
5. Ercolano, S. & Romano, O. (2018). Spending for the environment: General government expenditure trends in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1145-1169. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-017-1695-0]
6. Fullerton, D. & Kim, S. R. (2008). Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2), 141-154. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.02.001]
7. Galinato, G. I. & Galinato, S. P. (2016). The effects of government spending on deforestation due to agricultural land expansion and CO2 related emissions. Ecological Economics, 122, 43-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.025]
8. Gholipour, H. F. & Farzanegan, M. R. (2018). Institutions and the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection: evidence from Middle Eastern countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 29(1), 20-39. [DOI:10.1007/s10602-017-9246-x]
9. Halkos, G. E. & Paizanos, E. Α. (2013). The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecological Economics, 91, 48-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.002]
10. Hua, Y., Xie, R. & Su, Y. (2018). Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities: Identifying composition and technique effects. China Economic Review, 47, 156-169. [DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.09.007]
11. Huang, J. T. (2018). Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China-Evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 431-441. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.001]
12. Halkos, G. E. & Paizanos, E. A. (2017). The channels of the effect of government expenditure on the environment: evidence using dynamic panel data. Journal of environmental planning and management, 60(1), 135-157. [DOI:10.1080/09640568.2016.1145107]
13. Lopez, R., Galinato, G. I. & Islam, A. (2011). Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 180-198. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.001]
14. Lopez, R., Thomas, V. & Wang, Y. (2008). The quality of growth: Fiscal policies for better results, IEG Working Paper.
15. Maddah, M. & Raoufi, F. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of government expenditures on pollution based on simultaneous equations system approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(4), 155-166. {in Persian}
16. Mohamadzadeh, Y. & Ghahramani, H. (2017). Good governance role and size of government on environmental performance in selected countries. Journal of Environmental Studies, 43(3), 477-496. {in Persian}
17. Shahab, M. & Naser Sadrabad, S. (2014). Investigating the effect of economic policies of government on environmental quality in elected countries. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(2), 139-150. {in Persian}
18. Xie, X. & Wang, Y. (2019). Evaluating the Efficacy of Government Spending on Air Pollution Control: A Case Study from Beijing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(1), 1-15. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16010045]
19. Zhang, Q., Zhang, S., Ding, Z. & Hao, Y. (2017). Does government expenditure affect environmental quality? Empirical evidence using Chinese city-level data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 143-152. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.096]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Economic Modeling Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb