Volume 25, Issue 76 (4-2025)                   jgs 2025, 25(76): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

ahangari N, movsavi S, shahbaznejad R. The effect of ICT use and capability on knowledge-based urban development in Tehran metropolis. jgs 2025; 25 (76)
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4207-en.html
1- Kharazmi University , std_navid.ahangari@alumni.khu.ac.ir
2- Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (1587 Views)
In the age of knowledge, the rapid development of information and communication technology is considered as the main element to respond to the increasing urban environmental and socio-economic crises. Therefore, knowledge-based cities are cities that use technology and innovation to improve the quality of life of citizens and the efficiency of services aimed at sustainable urban development. Based on this, the current research was compiled with the aim of the impact of ICT use and capability on knowledge-based urban development. The research method is applied in terms of nature, in terms of the type of descriptive-analytical research (Structural Equation Modeling) and in terms of the type of post-event strategy. The method of data collection was library and field. The statistical population includes the experts of the Deputy of Urban Planning in 22 districts of Tehran Municipality, and the sample size was determined by targeted sampling of 220 people. Structural equation method and partial least squares approach and SmartPLS3 software were used to analyze the research data. The results indicated that the average variables of application and capability of information and communication technology and knowledge-based urban development of Tehran, along with all its components based on a 5-level spectrum, are in the range of 2.51 to 3.5, i.e., semi-stable. Also, the effect of the application and capability of information and communication technology on knowledge-based urban development has a significant coefficient greater than 1.96, and the path for the main research model is confirmed; Therefore, taking advantage of the application and ability to invest in the research and development of information and communication technology sectors can be a solution to remove the limitations of knowledge-based urban development in the metropolis of Tehran.
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Geography and Urban Planning
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/05/28

References
1. بهزادپور، الناز، فرزاد بهتاش، محمدرضا، سعیده زرآبادی، زهرا سادات (1400)، تبیین مدل مفهومی توسعه شهری دانش‌بنیان مبتنی بر رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری مورد پژوهی: کلان شهر تهران، فصلنامه شهر پایدار، سال چهارم، شماره ۲ (پیاپی ۱۴)، صص ۷۳ -۹۰.
2. Ahad, M. A., Paiva, S., Tripathi, G., & Feroz, N. (2020). Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
3. Behzadpour, E., Farzad Behtash, M. R., Saeeda Zarabadi, Z. S. (2021). Explanation of the conceptual model of knowledge-based urban development based on the interpretative structural modeling approach of the research case: Metropolis of Tehran, Sustainable city, 2 (14), pp. 73-90. (IN Persian).
4. Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C.C. and D'Auria, A. (2016). ICT and sustainability in smart cities management, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29 (2), pp. 132-147. doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132
5. Cai, Z., Cvetkovic, V., Page J. (2022). How Does ICT Expansion Drive "Smart" Urban Growth? A Case Study of Nanjing, China, rban Planning, 5(1), Pp. 129-139 DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i1.2561.
6. Camero, A., Alba, E. (2019). Smart city and information technology: A review. Cities, 93, pp. 84-94. doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014. [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014]
7. Chatterjee, S. Kar, A.K. (2018). Effects of successful adoption of information technology enabled services in proposed smart cities of India: From user experience perspective, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), pp. 189-209. [DOI:10.1108/JSTPM-03-2017-0008.]
8. Chatti, W., Majeed, M.T. (2022). Information communication technology (ICT), smart urbanization, and environmental quality: Evidence from a panel of developing and developed economies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 366. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132925
9. Cohen-Blankshtain, G., Rotem-Mindali, O. (2016). Key research themes on ICT and sustainable urban mobility, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), PP.9-17, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.820994.
10. Czamanski, D., Broitman, D. (2017). Information and communication technology and the spatial evolution of mature cities, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, 58(C), pages 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2016.10.003
11. del Río Castro, G., Fern'andez, M. C. G., & Colsa, 'A. U. (2020). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the sustainable development goals (SDGs), Journal of Cleaner Production,‌ 280(1), 122204.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204.
12. Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, k., Psarras, J. (2006). Knowledge cities: the answer to the needs of knowledge-based development, VINE, 36(1), pp.‌67‌-‌84. dx.doi.org/10.1108/03055720610667381.
13. Ghawana, T., Cumbe, R., Hespanha, J. P., Paixao, S., & Carneiro, A. F. T. (2020). Applicability of knowledge innovation value chain model for the land administration system of municipality of Maputo in Mozambique. Survey Review, 52(372), 205-214. doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1554852.
14. Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modeling metode alternatif dengan partial least square. In: Kedua, Edisi (Ed.), Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
15. Goel, K.R., Vishnoi, S. (2022). Urbanization and sustainable development for inclusiveness using ICTs, Telecommunications Policy, 46(6). doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102311.
16. Gouvea, R., Kapelianis, D., & Kassicieh, S. (2018). Assessing the nexus of sustainability and information & communications technology, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, 130(C), pages 39-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.023.
17. Haftu, G.G. (2019). Information communications technology and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A panel data approach, Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, 43(1), pages 88-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.010.
18. Ivaldi, E., Penco, L., Isola, G., Musso, E. (2020). Smart Sustainable Cities and the Urban Knowledge-Based Economy: A NUTS3 Level Analysis, Social Indicators Research,150, pp. 45-72. doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02292-0
19. Khoa, B.T. (2022). Dataset for the electronic customer relationship management based on S-O-R model in electronic commerce, Data in Brief12 March 2022. 42 (Cover date: June 2022) Article 108039. [DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108039.]
20. Knight, R. (2008). Knowledge-based development, in Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K. and Baum, S. (Eds), Knowledge-based Urban Development, Information Science Reference, London, pp. xiii-xxv.
21. Lechman, E., Marszk, A. (2019). ICT and Socio-Economic Development Dynamics, ICT-Driven Economic and Financial Development, pp. 143-191. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813798-7.00005-1
22. Lee, S. H., Han, J. H., Leem, Y. T., Yigitcanlar, T. (2008). Towards Ubiquitous City: Concept, Planning, and Ecperiences in the Republic of Korea, in Yigitcanlar, T.(ed), Knowledge-Based Urban Development: Planning and Applications in the Information Era.Hershey, New york: Information Science Regerence pp. 148-170.‌‌ DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-720-1.ch009. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-59904-720-1.ch009]
23. Lonnqvist, A., Kapyla, J., Salonius, H., Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). Knowledge That Matters: Identifying Regional Knowledge Assets of the Tampere Region, European Planning Studies, 22(10),‌ pp. 2011-2029. doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.814621.
24. Maeng, D.M., Nedović-Budić, Z. (2021). Relationship between ICT and urban form in knowledge-based development: empirical analysis of Washington, DC metro region, Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 1(1/2). P.‌97-116.‌ DOI: 10.1504/IJKBD.2010.032588
25. Michelam, L. D., Cortese, T. T. P., Yigitcanlar, T., & Vils, L. (2020). Knowledge-based urban development as a strategy to promote smart and sustainable cities. J. Environ. Manag. & Sust., 9(1), P .1-19, e18740. doi.org/10.5585/geas.v9i1.18740.
26. Navarro, J. L. A., Ruiz V. R.L., Peña, D. N. (2017). The effect of ICT use and capability on knowledge-based cities, Cities 60, P. 272-280.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.010.
27. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M. (2014). Urban knowledge and innovation spaces, Asia Pacific J. Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 8(1), pp. 15-38.
28. Pompigna, A., Mauro, R. (2021). Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the smart age. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (IF 5.155) Pub Date: 2021-05-07, DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.04.005.
29. Population Division. (2011). World Urbanization Prospects, The 2011 Revision. http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf.
30. Reddick, C. G., Enriquez, R., Harris, R. J., Sharma, B. (2020). Determinants of broadband access and affordability: An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide. Cities, 106, 102904. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904
31. Stanley, T.D., Doucouliagos, H., Steel, P. (2018). ‌Does ICT generate economic growth? A meta-regression analysis, Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, 32(3), pages 705-726. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12211
32. Tan, B., Evelyn, N.g, & Junhui J. (‌2018). The process of Technology Leapfrogging: Case analysis of the national ICT infrastructure development journey of Azerbaijan, International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, 38(1), pages 311-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.10.008.
33. Tranos, E., Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, P. (2013). Accessibility of cities in the digital economy. Cities, 30, 59-67. doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.001
34. United Nations. (2020). The sustainable development goals report. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ISBN 9789210049603. Wang, D., Zhou, T., Wang, M. (2021). Information and communication technology (ICT), digital divide and urbanization: Evidence from Chinese cities, Technology in Society, Elsevier, 64(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101516. [DOI:10.18356/ 214e6642-en.]
35. Yigitcanlar, T., and Sarimin, M. (2015). Multimedia Super Corridor, Malaysia: Knowledge-based urban development lessons from an emerging economy, VINE, 45 (1), pp. 126-147. [DOI:10.1108/VINE-06-2014-0041.]
36. Yigitcanlar, T., Inkinen, T. (2019). Theory and Practice of Knowledge Cities and Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Geographies of Disruption. Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_10.]
37. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K. (2008). Knowledge-Based Urban Development: The Local Economic Development Path of Brisbane, Australia, Local Economy, 23(3), pp. Pages 195-207. doi/abs/10.1080/02690940802197358.
38. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K. (2008a). Knowledge-based strategic planning, 3rd International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, Matera, pp. 296-306.
39. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K., Baum, S. (Eds) (2008b), Creative Urban Regions, Information Science Reference, London. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-59904-838-3]
40. Zheng, Y. (2017). Explaining Citizens E-Participation Usage: Functionality of EParticipation Applications, Adm.‌Soc. 49‌(3), 423-442, doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Applied researches in Geographical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb