[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publication statistics::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Publication Information
ju Publisher
Kharazmi University
ju Managing Director 
Nasergholi Sarli
ju Editor-in-Chief
Habib-Allah Abbasi
ju Manager
Zahra Saberi
ju In charge of the Site
Tahereh sadate Mirahmadi

EISSN 24766941
..
Indexing Databases

  AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
 AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
  AWT IMAGE 

   

..
Social Networks
   
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Khosravishakib

Mohammad Khosravishakib,
year 18, Issue 68 (7-2010)
Abstract

Critics’ includingVimsat, Brooks, Pen Waren and Renewelek, in their evaluation of poems have focused on differentiating features of classical poetry and modern poetry.Compared with the North branch of literary criticism, the South branch of New criticism has explored the formalistic and structural features of poems. Brooks in his book entitled modern and classical poetry maintains that the formalistic nature of poem stems from an array of intricacies of the corresponding society. Further, he adds that critics should delve into literary works in order to capture the details. Brooks in juxtaposition with narrative system of classical poem tries to establish four categories of formalistic system including categorical, rhetorical, abstract, and associational in the modern poetry. Brooks assumes that non- narrative systems are more complex than narrative ones and sometimes they can be integrated. This results in more density and difficulty in poems. This article probes the possibility of criticizing the contemporary poetry of Persian literature accoding to non- narrative forms.


Doctore Mohammad Khosravishakib,
year 32, Issue 96 (4-2024)
Abstract

 Proverbs are a cultural tool that, due to their compactness and special phonetic and literary patterns, can destroy the intellectual resistance of the audience and impose a kind of conceptual and expressive tyranny on them. The cultural semiotics of Persian proverbs shows that gender discrimination and reducing the status of women is rooted in cultural standards and norms. In many proverbs, women are considered "other and marginal" and men are considered "self and center". Using analytical, descriptive and qualitative methods, this article criticizes a number of gender proverbs with emphasis on cultural semiotics in order to show, along with pathology, that the dual opposition of "man" and "woman" How has it influenced and caused components such as "patriarchy", "marriage", "reproduction", "appearance beauty", "male economy", "mental strength", "leadership and management" etc. So that the woman is placed in the "margin" and the man in the "center" of the cultural text. The cultural semiotic analysis of proverbs shows the fact that being a "woman" is a product of patriarchal ideology; A thought that consciously seeks to be the "other" woman. This thinking removes women from the social scene with hidden control and repression and seeks their "symbolic annihilation".
 
 

Page 1 from 1     

دوفصلنامه  زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی Half-Yearly Persian Language and Literature
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 33 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645