|
|
|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 1 results for cheraghi
No Ebrahim Hasanaklou, No Reza Cheraghi,
year 32, Issue 96 (4-2024)
Abstract
The controversy over Nima's literary theory and poetry has a long history. Literary critics, each of them, supported Nima and presented a special interpretation of him. The problem of this research will be to read the opinions of Barahani and Pournamdarians of the seventies as representatives of academic and non-academic criticism. This research showed that Pournamdarian and Barahani made mistakes in their understanding of Nima and sometimes they went too far in their opinions. Despite all this, it can be said that despite trying to understand Nima in a new way, Pournamdarian is still trapped by the stereotyped traditions of literary criticism, which makes him define new poetry under traditional poetry. On the other hand, Barahani has neglected the historical process of Nima's theorizing and poetry, has gone to extremes in some of his opinions and announces a crisis that we can see in the poetry of the seventies. In other words, tradition and modernity are clearly incompatible in the opinions of these two critics. Pournamdarian wants to mix modern poetry with traditional criticism, and Barahani becomes dogmatic in his criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
