|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Field
Mohammad Mahdi Zamani, Ne’matollah Iranzadeh,
year 23, Issue 78 (5-2015)
Abstract
Rabe’e bent-e Ka’b-e Ghozdari, as available documents indicate, is the first female Persian-speaking poet. Scholars have mainly studied her life rather than her poetry. In this research her poetry is analyzed from a linguistic perspective, that is, it is analyzed semantically. Semantic-field theory is one of the theories derived from structural semantics, which is considered as one of the fields of structural linguistics. The analysis of the semantic fields of Rabe’e’s poetry is a step to the stylistic study of its semantic layers. In this study the semantic fields of her poetry that can be considered as stylistic features are recognized, such as whether her language is feminine or masculine, her poetry is mystical or not, and if her description of love is different from that of her contemporaries.
Mohammad Parsanasab, Fatemeh Ahmadizade Kohan,
year 29, Issue 91 (12-2021)
Abstract
Boasting (Mofakhereh in Persian) as a poetic theme or as a sub-genre has a strong presence in the books of poems of classical Persian poets. Adopting an analytical approach, this research attempted at analyzing ‘boasting’ in poems of Manouchehri Damghani, Sanaei Ghaznavi, and Khaghani Shervani based on Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory. To do so, after extracting instances of their ‘boasting’ odes and considering the historical and social issues of their times and their different habitus and mindsets, we tried to analyze the poems based on Bourdieu’s four literary field principles (habitus, capital, struggle, and disinterestedness). The results showed that Manouchehri, due to his inclination to the power filed, and to make a name and a living and to stabilize his position, used his art and poetry for boasting. He did not observe the principle of disinterestedness in the literary field which attempts at purifying literature from personal intentions. As a result, he was pushed to the margin. But as the power field changed during the second Ghaznavid and Seljuk periods and some new problems and instabilities affected poets’ conditions, poets such as Sanaei and Khaghani distanced themselves from the power field, due to their specific habitus, and attempted at purifying literature and fighting the power field. From the two poets, Khaghani was more successful due to his disinterestedness and observance of the rules of the literary field.
Zohreh Fallahi, Ahmad Khiyali Khatibi, Mohammad Sadegh Farbod,
year 31, Issue 95 (11-2023)
Abstract
In Bourdieu's theory of action, the literary work is the reproduction of cultural capital and the result of a combination of economic capital and the habitus. Additionally, it is a social action that a person shows in the literary field. Poetry, as a literary work, is a product of the mental dimension of cultural capital, which appears as a material success and objectified by the poet. This research compares the poetic actions of Nima and Akhavan with an approach to the capital and field based on Pierre Bourdieu's sociological theory in order to answer the questions of how the actions of these two poets are expressed with their decisions and how they react to the actions of others and the socio-political conditions of the society. The background of the research shows that many researchers paid little attention to this matter. The methodology of this study, in terms of nature and method, is descriptive-analytical and regarding its purpose, is fundamental-theoretical. The results indicated that both poets have similarities in some poetic actions but have different reactions in some others, the process of which is writing social-political poems in the field of Persian poetry production.
|
|
