|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 7 results for Nima
Taghi Pournamdarian,
year 14, Issue 55 (3-2007)
Abstract
Often readers and even critics believe that the ideology and message of poems are more important than their structures. However, it's impossible to draw a distinction between ideology and structure as the structure of a poem is the primary element that influences the readership. Nima ,as the architect of the contemporary poetry relying on his own sharp and independent insights, revived the significance of the structure in Persian literature. Many enthusiastic readers and even critics of the field of cotemporary poetry have considered Nima as the poet of 'Ai Adamha'. This paper attempts to explore why Nima has been called Ai Adfamha poet. Obviously, the significance of the poem 'Ai Adamha' and similar poetic structures lies in their literary figures and expectations embedded in their novel forms than their frequent content and message. The repetition of the dominant element of Ai Adamha in the structure of the poem has, in addition to strengthening the skeleton of the poem, enhanced the syntactic integrity, musical system, coherence, and creative opening and ending of the poem. This article attempts to analyze 'Ai Adamha' from a formalistic perspective and in doing so it paves the way for the readership to delve into the less frequently uncovered senses of the contemporary poetry.
Kamran Ahmadgoli, Edris Ranji,
year 23, Issue 79 (1-2016)
Abstract
The time, life, poetry, literary and critical theories of William Wordsworth, the pioneer of Romanticism in English literature, and Nima Youshij, who is often regarded as a Romantic in some part of his literary career, share many similarities. Both poets lived at a time of revolution and turmoil and both revolted against the dominant literary conventions of their time with their efforts accordingly leading to revolutions in the poetry and literary theory of their land. After delineating the accepted tenets of the Romantic Movement, this article highlights the analogous biographical, socio-economical and philosophical contexts of the two poets’ career and studies the affinities of their attempts at modernizing the poetic theory and practice of their countries. To this aim, the two poets’ attitude towards concepts such as poetry and the poet, content, language, feelings and emotions, and society are examined in detail. It is explained that by being influenced by their time and the historical evolutions in the age of social, cultural and economic revolutions, the two poets were able to bring the revolution into the poetry and critical theory and practice of their time. This revolution consists of realizing the novel concepts of the age and expressing them in a new form, which is considered as the commencement of “Modern” English poetry in England and “New” Persian poetry in Iran.
Roya Rezayi, Mohammad Amir Mashhadi, Hamid Reza Shayiri, Abbas Nikbakht,
year 25, Issue 82 (9-2017)
Abstract
Discourse is the domain of producing meaning and metadiscourse is the use of ploys and techniques by the speaker to protect, repair, modify, approve, justify and guarantee his own speech.Nima byemploying metadiscourse, which appearson various levels such as emotional, religious, historical, cultural, and scientific, seeks to highlight his own language and to add consolidation and continuity to the meaning of his words.The main objective of this study is to categorize and analyze the types Nima used in the discourse of his letters with a review of some of those letter, in the process of production and continuity of meaning.
Hamed Noruzi, Setareh Abghari, Seyed Mohammad Hessein Ghoreishi,
year 31, Issue 94 (6-2023)
Abstract
“Dirin Dirin” animation series is one of the most successful adult comic animation series, which has a critical view on various social issues and has attracted many audiences. In this article, the authors have sought to analyze the humor-creating factors in this animation. The present analysis was conducted using the general theory of verbal humor. This theory investigates humor using six sources: the knowledge of script opposition, logical mechanism, target, situation, narrative strategy, and language. For this purpose, 65 episodes of this series were randomly selected and analyzed based on the general theory of verbal humor. The obtained results indicated that the sources of script opposition (average 2.27%), logical mechanism (average 2.61%), narrative strategy, and language were found in all the episodes, and for situation source, 75% of the analyzed episodes had a situation which itself created humor. In the source of knowledge, 23 episodes had a critical purpose, and 43 episodes had an educational purpose. Based on the findings of this research, the sources of the knowledge of script opposition, logical mechanism, and language are the most important factors in creating humor in this animation series.
Dr Ahmad Sancholi,
year 31, Issue 94 (6-2023)
Abstract
Macro-construction refers to the basic structure that explains and interprets the system and organization of a text or discourse. In the study of the macro-construction of Nima’s quatrains, which is based on the discourse and text construction plan of Lotfollah Yarmohammadi about Khayyam’s quatrains and is grounded on three constructs of “description”, “recommendation” and “explanation”; three more constructs of “wish”, “regret” and “surprise” are also recognizable. According to this plan, Nima’s quatrains can be divided into three groups of one-construct, two-construct, and three-construct quatrains. The one-construct quatrains account for more than half of all Nima’s quatrains. The main and pivotal construct in Nima’s quatrains is the description construct, which has the highest frequency, in which Nima describes his condition, especially his emotional condition through romantic conversations with his beloved one. Moreover, the descriptions of nature, man, the world, and other general categories are other aspects of the description construct in Nima’s quatrains. Since in the communication system of Nima’s quatrains, the sender is in the center and focus, the discourse of his quatrains is descriptive. In these poems, Nima’s perspective on categories such as love, man, and the world is often a view based on traditional attitude and just in the quatrains in which he describes nature, the signs of his novel insight are visible.
Zohreh Fallahi, Ahmad Khiyali Khatibi, Mohammad Sadegh Farbod,
year 31, Issue 95 (11-2023)
Abstract
In Bourdieu's theory of action, the literary work is the reproduction of cultural capital and the result of a combination of economic capital and the habitus. Additionally, it is a social action that a person shows in the literary field. Poetry, as a literary work, is a product of the mental dimension of cultural capital, which appears as a material success and objectified by the poet. This research compares the poetic actions of Nima and Akhavan with an approach to the capital and field based on Pierre Bourdieu's sociological theory in order to answer the questions of how the actions of these two poets are expressed with their decisions and how they react to the actions of others and the socio-political conditions of the society. The background of the research shows that many researchers paid little attention to this matter. The methodology of this study, in terms of nature and method, is descriptive-analytical and regarding its purpose, is fundamental-theoretical. The results indicated that both poets have similarities in some poetic actions but have different reactions in some others, the process of which is writing social-political poems in the field of Persian poetry production.
No Ebrahim Hasanaklou, No Reza Cheraghi,
year 32, Issue 96 (4-2024)
Abstract
The controversy over Nima's literary theory and poetry has a long history. Literary critics, each of them, supported Nima and presented a special interpretation of him. The problem of this research will be to read the opinions of Barahani and Pournamdarians of the seventies as representatives of academic and non-academic criticism. This research showed that Pournamdarian and Barahani made mistakes in their understanding of Nima and sometimes they went too far in their opinions. Despite all this, it can be said that despite trying to understand Nima in a new way, Pournamdarian is still trapped by the stereotyped traditions of literary criticism, which makes him define new poetry under traditional poetry. On the other hand, Barahani has neglected the historical process of Nima's theorizing and poetry, has gone to extremes in some of his opinions and announces a crisis that we can see in the poetry of the seventies. In other words, tradition and modernity are clearly incompatible in the opinions of these two critics. Pournamdarian wants to mix modern poetry with traditional criticism, and Barahani becomes dogmatic in his criticism.
|
|
