Volume 10, Issue 20 (11-2020)                   JRSM 2020, 10(20): 31-44 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazarpouri S, Bahram A. The Relationship between Movement Motivation and Motor Development in Infants with and without Experience of Kindergarten. JRSM 2020; 10 (20) :31-44
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2479-en.html
The Relationship between Movement Motivation and Motor Development in Infants with and without Experience of Kindergarten
Shahram Nazarpouri 1, Abbas Bahram2
1- Lorestan University , snazarpouri@yahoo.com
2- Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (4105 Views)

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between movement motivation and motor development in infants with and without the experience of kindergarten. The population of this study included all parents with infant's boys with 10 to 11 month in Tehran. Among them, 150 infants with and 150 infants without the experience of kindergarten using the multi-stage random sampling the method was selected as the sample groups. Data collection tools included an infant movement motivation questionnaire and Peabody Developmental Motor Scale–Second Edition (PDMS-2), the data analysis was done using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, linear regression, and t-test in a significance level of p≤0.05. The results showed that there was a significant relationship (P=0/000), between movement motivation and motor development in infants with and without the experience of kindergarten. In the same context, a significant difference (P=0/000), was obtained in movement motivation and motor development between of infants with and without kindergarten experience and infants without the kindergarten experience, movement motivation, and motor development was higher. These results indicate that care of infants in kindergarten Centers may be due to the weakness of the programs and facilities have negative effects on of them movement motivation and motor development.

Keywords: : Movement motivation, Motor Development, Infants, Kindergarten
Full-Text [PDF 930 kb]   (1375 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: motor behavior
Received: 2017/05/8 | Accepted: 2017/08/2 | ePublished ahead of print: 2020/10/24 | Published: 2020/11/30
References
1. Gallahue DL , Ozmun GC, Goodway JD. Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. 7th Edition, Kindle Edition. 2012.
2. Payne VG, Isaacs LD. Human Motor Development a Lifespan Approach. Eight Edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 2012.
3. Atun-Einy O, Berger SE, Scher A. Assessing motivation to move and its relationship to motor development in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 2013; 36(3), 457-469. [DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.006]
4. Abdoli B. Psychosocial foundations of physical education and sports. Tehran, Bamdad Ketab Publications, 2005. In Persian.
5. Thelen, E. Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues: 15., 255-283. 2005. [DOI:10.1080/10481881509348831]
6. Von Hosteen C. Action in development. Developmental Science: 10. 54-60. 2007. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00564.x]
7. Berger SE, Adolph KE, Lobo SA. Out of the toolbox: Toddlers differentiate wobbly and wooden handrails. Child Development: 2005. 76., 1294-1307. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00851.x]
8. Khalaji H. Investigating the relationship between anthropometric characteristics and motor performance of 6 to 8-year-old students with experience and without experience in Arak Kindergarten (2004-2005 academic year), Peyk Noor: 2004. No. 4 (3): 18-30. In Persian.
9. Loovis EM, Butterfield SA. Relationship of hand length to catching performance by children in kindergarten to grade 2. Perceptual and motor skills. 2003 Jun;96(3_suppl):1194-6. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2003.96.3c.1194]
10. Weikartr D. A cooparative study of the preschool: curriculum,in C.seefeld(Ed). The Early childhood curriculum New arm armicha university. 1969. pp:20-29.
11. Zigler E, Valentine J. Project Head Start: A legacy of the war on poverty. 1979.
12. Housden T, Kam R. Full-Day Kindergarten: A Summary of the Research.1992.
13. Lemos AG, Avigo EL, Barela JA. Physical education in kindergarten promotes fundamental motor skill development. Advances in Physical Education. 2012 Feb 16;2(01):17. [DOI:10.4236/ape.2012.21003]
14. Chaves R, Baxter-Jones A, Gomes T, Souza M, Pereira S, Maia J. Effects of individual and school-level characteristics on a child's gross motor coordination development. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2015 Aug;12(8):8883-96. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph120808883]
15. Doralp S, Bartlett D. Infant Movement Motivation Questionnaire: Development of a measure evaluating infant characteristics relating to motor development in the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development. 2014 Aug 1;37(3):326-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.04.002]
16. Provost B, Heimerl S, McClain C, Kim NH, Lopez BR, Kodituwakku P. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 in children with developmental delays. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2004 Oct 1;16(3):149-56. [DOI:10.1097/01.PEP.0000136005.41585.FE]
17. Rahmaniresa A. Determination of Peabody Development Motor Scale (PDMS) validity and reliability in 0-2 year-old infants of Tehran. Master of sciences dissertation, University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2008.
18. Farsi A, Abdoli B, Kaviani M, Kaviani A (2010). The effect of perceptual-motor experience on the motor development benefit of large and fine movements of 5-8 months old infants. Growth and learning of motor-sports- No. 5- P.: 84-71. In Persian.
19. Shirley MM. The First Two Years. Vol. I, Postural and Locomotor Development; Vol. II, Intellectual Development; Vol. III, Personality Manifestations.1931.
20. Adolph KE, Cole WG, Komati M, Garciaguirre JS, Badaly D, Lingeman JM, Chan GL, Sotsky RB. How do you learn to walk? Thousands of steps and dozens of falls per day. Psychological science. 2012 Nov;23(11):1387-94. [DOI:10.1177/0956797612446346]
21. Gibson EJ, Pick AD. An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford University Press, USA; 2000. [DOI:10.1207/S15326969ECO1204_04]
22. Newman BM, Newman PR. Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Cengage Learning; 2017. Apr 12.
23. Winders PC. The goal and opportunity of physical therapy for children with Down syndrome. 2011.
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb