Volume 13, Issue 25 (9-2023)                   JRSM 2023, 13(25): 1-12 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Osouli H, Shahbazi M, Arabameri E. The Effect of Providing Different Strategies of Self-control Feedback Through Self-modeling on Learning of Lay-up shot Basketball Skill. JRSM 2023; 13 (25) :1-12
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2684-en.html
1- University of Tehran
2- University of Tehran , shahbazimehdi@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5209 Views)
A few studies have examined the interactive self-control effect on the type of self-modeling feedback. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of providing different strategies of self-control feedback through self-modeling on learning of Lay-up shot basketball skill. For this purpose, 60 right-handed 11-13 years old male beginner students were selected through available sampling. Then they were divided into 4 groups randomly. One of the groups between the blocks and the other group before training session defined to get the type of self-modeling feedback (best performance or overall performance in Lay-up shot basketball skill). For each of these groups, the yoked group was selected. The training program was conducted for 6 sessions for two weeks. Pretest, retention and transfer test were made in 12 attempts. Results showed significant effect between pretest with retention and transfer tests scores. Also, there was significant difference between the self-control feedback before sessions and the self-control feedback between the blocks groups and their yoked group in the retention and transfer tests (P≤001), While between the yoked groups did not had any significant difference. These results indicate the greater effect of self-control feedback during sessions, which emphasizes the greater autonomy of learners as one of the psychological needs for learning optimization.
 
 
Full-Text [PDF 1394 kb]   (725 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: motor behavior
Received: 2018/07/6 | Accepted: 2019/01/26 | ePublished ahead of print: 2020/10/24 | Published: 2023/09/11

References
1. 1. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, Tennant LK, Cauraugh JHJRQfE, Sport. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. 1997;68(4):269-79. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008]
2. Wulf GJP. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. 2007;93(2):96-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005]
3. حبیبی. 1388. مقایسه اثر تواتر بازخورد خود کنترلی بر اکتساب، یادداری وانتقال یک تکلیف پرتابی در کودکان ده ساله. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه شهید باهنر.
4. Bund A. Self-controlled learning of the forehand topspin stroke in table tennis. 2003.
5. Chiricowsky S, Wulf G. Self-control feedback: does it enhance learning because performance get feedback when need it? Res Q exerc Sport. 2002;73(4):408-15. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040]
6. Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1999;70(3):265-72. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045]
7. Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-Controlled Performance Feedback and Learning of a Closed Motor Skill 1. Perceptual and motor skills. 1995;81(2):627-34. [DOI:10.1177/003151259508100253]
8. Andrieux M, Danna J, Thon BJRqfe, sport. Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. 2012;83(1):27-35. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599822]
9. Ste-Marie DM, Vertes KA, Law B, Rymal AMJFiP. Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. 2013;3:556. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556]
10. Wu WF, Magill RAJRqfe, sport. Allowing learners to choose: self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. 2011;82(3):449-57. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2011.10599777]
11. CDATA-Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
12. Ste-Marie DM, Rymal A, Vertes K, Martini RJJoASP. Self-modeling and competitive beam performance enhancement examined within a self-regulation perspective. 2011;23(3):292-307. [DOI:10.1080/10413200.2011.558049]
13. Starek J, McCullagh PJTSP. The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginning swimmers. 1999;13(3):269-87. [DOI:10.1123/tsp.13.3.269]
14. Zetou E, Kourtesis T, Getsiou K, Michalopoulou M, Kioumourtzoglou EJAITOJoSP. The effect of self-modeling on skill learning and self-efficacy of novice female beach-volleyball players. 2008;10(3).
15. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DM. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of sports sciences. 2007;25(5):577-86. [DOI:10.1080/02640410600947090]
16. Marques PG, Corrêa UCJAp. The effect of learner's control of self-observation strategies on learning of front crawl. 2016;164:151-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.006]
17. Fairbrother JT, Laughlin DD, Nguyen TVJFiP. Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. 2012;3:323. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00323]
18. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DM, Martini RJPoS, Exercise. The thought processes underlying self-as-a-model interventions: An exploratory study. 2006;7(4):381-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.09.001]
19. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DMJJoss. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. 2007;25(5):577-86. [DOI:10.1080/02640410600947090]
20. Martini R, Rymal A, Ste-Marie DMJIJoSS, Engineering. Investigating self-as-a-model techniques and underlying cognitive processes in adults learning the butterfly swim stroke. 2011;5(4):242-56.
21. Ste-Marie DM, Vertes K, Rymal AM, Martini RJFip. Feedforward self-modeling enhances skill acquisition in children learning trampoline skills. 2011;2:155. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00155]
22. Wulf G, Lewthwaite RJPB, Review. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. 2016;23(5):1382-414. [DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9]
23. Aiken CA, Fairbrother JT, Post PGJFip. The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. 2012;3:338. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00338]
24. Oldfield RCJN. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. 1971;9(1):97-113. [DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4]
25. سیدی، جلال. اصلانخانی، محمدعلی. 1387. مقایسه تاثیر تمرین بدنی و تصویر سازی ذهنی بر انتقال طرفی در مهارت سه گام بسکتبال. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
26. Copeland BL, Franks BDJTJosm, fitness p. Effects of types and intensities of background music on treadmill endurance. 1991;31(1):100-3.
27. Choi Y, Qi F, Gordon J, Schweighofer NJJomb. Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. 2008;40(4):273-80. [DOI:10.3200/JMBR.40.4.273-280]
28. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf GJRqfe, sport. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. 2005;76(1):42-8. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260]
29. Lai Q, Shea CHJRqfe, sport. Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. 1999;70(1):79-83. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10607734]
30. هرگنهان، بی آر. السون، میتواچ. ترجمه سیف، علی‌اکبر. نظریه های یادگیری. انتشارات دوران. 1396;26(8):1-400.
31. Taghavi F, editor Dust Storm Monitoring Using Satellite Observatory and Numerical Modeling Analysis. 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly; 2010.
32. Engelstaedter S. Dust storm frequencies and their relationship to land surface conditions. Freidrich-Schiller University press, Jena, Germany. 2001.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb