Volume 10, Issue 19 (8-2020)                   JRSM 2020, 10(19): 31-56 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Majidi C, Saffari M, Khabiri M. Adventure Sports Development Paradigm. JRSM 2020; 10 (19) :31-56
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2471-en.html
Adventure Sports Development Paradigm
Chalak Majidi 1, Marjan Saffari2 , Mohammad Khabiri3
1- Kharazmi University , chalakmajidi@gmail.com
2- Tarbiat Modarres University
3- Tehran University
Abstract:   (5146 Views)

In the recent years, adventure sports have been growing increasingly. Adventure sports are new and appealing activities that regularly include some kinds of physical and mental challenges and relative presence of natural environment. These activities are presenting new paths and sometime they called as a serious competitor for mainstream sport. The aim of this study was to present a paradigm for adventure sports development. The qualitative methodology used in this study has followed an interpretive approach that was achieved by grounded theory. Data was collected from literature, interviews, focus groups, adventure sports related documentary films and movies. Results of this study are presenting adventure sports paradigm. In this paradigm developmental causal conditions of adventure sports, contexture of adventure sports, existing intervening conditions and contextual conditions, strategies and tactics for developing adventure sports and finally consequences. To appropriate recognition and encountering with this field, that most probably will be one of the main part of sport, we suggest doing more scientific research, especially with futurology approaches. 

Keywords: Paradigm, Adventure Sports, Alternative Sports, Qualitative research, Grounded Theory
Full-Text [PDF 1116 kb]   (1683 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: sport management
Received: 2017/04/18 | Accepted: 2017/09/3 | Published: 2020/08/31
References
1. Harro A. Classification of behavioral goals in the psychomotor area. 2 ed. Tehran: The Ministry of Education, Research and Planning Organization; 1989.
2. Richard M. Motor Learning :Concepts and Applications 8ed. Tehran: Hananeh; 2017.
3. Âbasi S, Hadian MR. The Effect of Eye-Hand Coordination Activities on Hand Skills of 7-10 Year-Old Educable Students with Down Syndrome. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2011;21(83):54-8.
4. Swinnen SP, Lee TD, Verschueren S, Serrien DJ, Bogaerds H. Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human movement science. 1997;16(6):749-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(97)00020-1]
5. Ghanavati T, Salavati M, Karimi N, Negahban H, Takamjani IE, Mehravar M, et al. Intra-limb coordination while walking is affected by cognitive load and walking speed. Journal of biomechanics. 2014;47(10):2300-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.038]
6. Nagaraj T. Effect of general specific and combined fitness training on selected skill related fitness and performance among cricket players. Paripex-Indian journal of research. 2017; 5(3): 47-48‌.
7. Abedin M, Ali H, Hadi Y. Effect of Aging and Volleyball Experience on the Continuous Bimanual Coordination Task. Scientific Journal Management System. 2012;2(5):5-18.
8. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Corriveau H. Validation of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(5):993-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.007]
9. Cardoso AA, Magalhães Lde C. Bilateral coordination and motor sequencing in Brazilian children: preliminary construct validity and reliability analysis. Occupational therapy international. 2009;16(2):107-21. [DOI:10.1002/oti.273]
10. Vaara M, SL K. Reliability of novel coordination and balance tests. 14th International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy 7-12 June; Barcelona, Spain2003.
11. Ong NCH. The use of the Vienna Test System in sport psychology research: A review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2015;8(1):204-23. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2015.1061581]
12. Chraif M, Ani ei M. Gender Differences in Motor Coordination at Young Students at Psychology. International journal of social science and humanity. 2013:147-50. [DOI:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.215]
13. Nazemzadegan g, bagherzadeh f, hemayattalab r, farsi a. The Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Load on Duration and Accuracy of Bimanual Coordination Task. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement. 2010;2(1):133-49.
14. Farsi A, Abdoli B, Kaviyani M. The Comparison of the Effects of Attentional-Cognitive Load and Motor-Cognitive Load on Bimanual Coordination Performance. Development & Motor Learning. 2011;3(7):43-.
15. Heydar S, Mohammad H. Design, construction, validation and reliability of simultaneous kinematic measurement of kinematic motion and distribution of water pressure in swimming. Sports Medicine Studies. 2010(7):31-46.
16. Latash ML. Fundamentals of Motor Control. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. 149-70 p. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-415956-3.00009-9]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb