Volume 6, Issue 3 (10-2019)
Human Information Interaction 2019, 6(3): 72-81 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Geraei E, Fathi L. Explaining the Concept and Models of Serendipity In Information Search Process. Human Information Interaction 2019; 6 (3)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2842-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2842-en.html
Lorestan University
Abstract: (3573 Views)
Background and Aim: Searching for information is not always a targeted activity; it can also be done involuntarily. The serendipity has the ability to find information randomly and as something happy, something unexpected, or a pleasant surprise. This paper examines and analyzes the concept of serendipity and its models in the process of information searching.
Methods: The present study uses a library research method to study concept of serendipity and its models in the process of information searching.
Results: Serendipity is a term for a broad and multifaceted phenomenon. Widespread vague nature of serendipity has made it difficult to study and inspect, and has led to numerous explanations and clarifications from researchers. The serendipity (accidental information discovery) is different from the purposeful search of information, because it is more about dealing with information or accidentally discovering information. Unexpected (accidental), intelligent, and valuable or potentially valuable results of the requirements of a worthwhile experience.
Conclusion: Understanding serendipity as an integral part of information behavior can be effective in identifying strategies for retrieving information that leads to accidental information discovery.
Methods: The present study uses a library research method to study concept of serendipity and its models in the process of information searching.
Results: Serendipity is a term for a broad and multifaceted phenomenon. Widespread vague nature of serendipity has made it difficult to study and inspect, and has led to numerous explanations and clarifications from researchers. The serendipity (accidental information discovery) is different from the purposeful search of information, because it is more about dealing with information or accidentally discovering information. Unexpected (accidental), intelligent, and valuable or potentially valuable results of the requirements of a worthwhile experience.
Conclusion: Understanding serendipity as an integral part of information behavior can be effective in identifying strategies for retrieving information that leads to accidental information discovery.
References
1. Agarwal, N.K. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Information Research, 20(3), 675.
2. Björneborn L. (2017).Three key affordances for serendipity: Toward a framework connecting environmental and personal factors in serendipitous encounters. Journal of Documentation, 73(5), 1053-1081. [DOI:10.1108/JD-07-2016-0097]
3. Case, D.O. (2012). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
4. Case, D. O.; Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley: Emerald. [DOI:10.1108/S2055-53772016022]
5. Cooksey, E.B. (2004).Too important to be left to chance - serendipity and the digital library. Science and Technology Libraries, 25(1), 23-32. [DOI:10.1300/J122v25n01_03]
6. Copeland, S. (2017). On serendipity in science: discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom. Synthese, 194(1), 1-22.
7. Cunha, M.P.E. (2005). Serendipity: Why some organizations are luckier than others. FEUNL Working Paper. 472. Available at: http://libraries.novasbe.pt/index.php/e-resources/nsbe-wp/item/serendipity-why-some-organizations-are-luckier-than-others. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.882782]
8. Cunha, M. P.; Clegg, S.R.; Mendonça, S. (2010). On serendipity and organizing. European Management Journal, 28(5), 319-330. [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.001]
9. Erdelez, S. (2004). Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 1013-1025. [DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.02.002]
10. Erdelez S.; Heinström J.; Makri S.; Björneborn L.; Beheshti J.;Toms E. et al. (2016). Research perspectives on serendipity and information encountering. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-5. [DOI:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301011]
11. Fine, G.; Deegan, J. (1996). Three principles of serendipity: insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 434-447. [DOI:10.1080/0951839960090405]
12. Foster, A.; Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321-340. [DOI:10.1108/00220410310472518]
13. Ikoja-Odongo, R.; Mostert, J. (2006). Information seeking behaviour: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 72(3), 145-15. [DOI:10.7553/72-3-1112]
14. Lu, J. C. (2012). Accidental discovery of information on the user- defined social web: a mixed-method study. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburg. School of Information Science.
15. Lutz, C.; Pieter Hoffmann, C.; Meckel, M. (2017). Online serendipity: A contextual differentiation of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(7), 1698-1710. [DOI:10.1002/asi.23771]
16. Makri, S.; Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 684-705 [DOI:10.1108/00220411211256030]
17. Makri, S.; Blandford, A.;Woods, M.; Sharples, S. ;Maxwell, D.(2014). "Making my own luck": Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. JASIST, 65(11), 2179-94. [DOI:10.1002/asi.23200]
18. Makri, S.; Bhuiya, J.; Carthy, J.; Owusu-Bonsu, J. (2015). Observing serendipity in digital information environments. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol, 52(1), 1-10. [DOI:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010019]
19. McCay-Peet, L.; Toms, E.G. (2010). The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, 377-382. [DOI:10.1145/1840784.1840842]
20. McCay-Peet, L.; Toms, E.G. ; Kellaway, E.K. (2014). Development and assessment of the content validity of a scale to measure how well a digital environment facilitates serendipity .Information Research, 19(3), 630.
21. McCay-Peet, L.; Toms, E. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. JASIST, 66 (7), 1463-1476. [DOI:10.1002/asi.23273]
22. McCay-Peet, L.; Toms, E.; & Kelloway, E.K. (2015). Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment, and individual differences. Inf. Process. Manage, 51, 391-412. [DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.004]
23. McCay-Peet, L.; Wells, P. (2017). Serendipity in the sciences: Exploring the boundaries. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institution of Science (PNSIS), 49(1), 97-116. [DOI:10.15273/pnsis.v49i1.6981]
24. Race, T.M.; Makri, S. (2016). Accidental Information Discovery. Chandos Publishing, Oxford, 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/B978-1-84334-750-7.00001-7]
25. Rubin, V.L.; Burkell, J; Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16 (3), 488.
26. Sun, X.; Sharples, S. & Makri, S.(2011). A user-centred mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research ". Information Research, 16 (3) ,492. Available at: http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper492.html.
27. Toms, E. (2000). Serendipitous Information Retrieval. DELOS.
28. Van Andel, P. (1994). Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Origin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(2), 631-648. [DOI:10.1093/bjps/45.2.631]
29. Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000007145]
30. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human Information Behavior. Informing Science, 3 (2), 49-55. [DOI:10.28945/576]
31. Zhou, X.; Sun, X.; Wang, Q.; Sharples, S.(2018). A context-based study of serendipity in information research among Chinese scholars. Journal of Documentation, 74(3), 526-551. [DOI:10.1108/JD-05-2017-0079]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
