Volume 8, Issue 3 (11-2021)                   Human Information Interaction 2021, 8(3): 57-73 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

rahimi S. A Survey on Ilam Public Librarians' attitudes related to library practices and online privacy. Human Information Interaction 2021; 8 (3)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2941-en.html
Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract:   (2169 Views)
Purpose: The purpose was to determine the attitude of Illam’s public librarians regarding online privacy.
Method: This is an applied survey research.  Out of the population of public Librerians in Illam,  136 public librarians were selected as a sample. Toman and McKinnon (2018) questionnaire was the intruemnt used to collect data. The questionnaire reliability of 0.91   was obtained through Cronbach's alpha. In order to analyze the data, frequency distribution tables and chi-square test were used by SPSS.
Findings: Librarians are concerned that government and corporations collect a great deal of personal information about them, and believe that government agencies and institutions should not share individuals' personal information with third parties except with the individual's consent.
Conclusion: There is an increased concerns about privacy in the libraries, which has amplified over the last five years. Public libraries do not teach online privacy expertise to users and librarians. Also, some librarians believe that libraries have no policy on protecting users' privacy. Public libraries in Ilam province should take additional stern measures to protect the online privacy of librarians and users and formulate policies in this area, as well as explain the existing policies to the librarians.
Full-Text [PDF 624 kb]   (769 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Acquisti, A. & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, 1(3); 26-33. [DOI:10.1109/MSP.2005.22]
2. Altman, I. (1977). Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific? Journal of social issues, 3(33); 66-84. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01883.x]
3. American Library Association (2008). Professional ethics. Retrieved from http: // www.ala.org / tools /ethics.
4. American Library Association (2014). Privacy tool kit. Retrieved from http: //www.ala. org /advocacy /privacy/toolkit.
5. Ard, B. J. (2016). Librarians as privacy advocates. A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 1(13); 161-173.
6. Association of College and Research Libraries (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from: http: // www.ala .org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/ files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf.
7. Azizi, Z. (2019). Investigating the factors affecting online privacy literacy of Razi university students. Master thesis, Razi University, Faculty of social sciences, Department of information science and knowledge. (In Persian)
8. Azizi, Z., Rahimi, S., & Ahmadi, V. (2020). A Survey on Online Privacy Literacy Level of Razi University Students. Jundishapur Education Development Journal, 3; 472-484. (In Persian)
9. Bartsch, M. & Dienlin, T. (2016). Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, (56); 147-154. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.022]
10. Coombs, K. A. (2004). Walking a tightrope: Academic libraries and privacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 6(30); 493-498. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.08.003]
11. Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. New York: Psychology Press.
12. Hamidi, H. (2015). Ethics and protection of children's online privacy with parental consent. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 10(3); 41-57. (In Persian)
13. Hess, A. N., LaPorte-Fiori, R. & Engwall, K. (2015). Preserving patron privacy in the 21stcentury academic library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(41); 105-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.010]
14. Hosseini seno, A., Mazaheri, E. (2018). The effect of perceived privacy, security and trust on information sharing behavior on mobile social networks; the moderating role of the gender variable. Iranian Journal of Information Science and Technology Research Quarterly, 34(1); 245-274. (In Persian)
15. Jeske, M., Intahchomphoo, C., Landriault, E., & Bioni, B. R. (2016). The intersection of freedom of information, privacy legislation and library services in Canadian jurisdictions. Legal Information Management, 1(16); 14-21. [DOI:10.1017/S1472669616000050]
16. Lambert, A. D., Parker, M., & Bashir, M. (2015). Library patron privacy in jeopardy an analysis of the privacy policies of digital content vendors. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1(52); 1-9. [DOI:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010044]
17. Lee, H., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 9(71); 862-877. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.01.005]
18. Nori. S, & Shahshojaee. A. (2010). Information ethics in the digital environment. Quarterly Journal of National Library and Information Studies, 90; 27-47. (In Persian)
19. Parsazadeh, A., & Shaghaghi, M. (2009). Public library and social reality construction. Information research and public libraries, 15(4); 29-60. (In Persian)
20. Porqhrmany, B. (2013). Computer ethics, principles and rules. Tehran: First National Congress of the Emerging Cyberspace and Social Damage. (Persian).
21. Shaqaqi. M, & Vasfi. M. R. (2015). Searching for the historical roots of "information ethics" in library and information science. Library and Information Sciences, (18)2; 69-102. (In Persian(
22. Shaqaqi. M. (2020). A review of the book Professional Ethics in Library and Information Science. Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs, (20)10; 223-242. (In Persian(
23. Siyasirad, F., & Bicharanlo, A. (1017). Patterns for using online privacy literacy strategies; Case Study: Instagram Girl Users. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly, 10(3); 125-151. (In Persian)
24. Skrinjaric, B., Budak, J., & Rajh, E. (2019). Perceived quality of privacy protection regulations and online privacy concern. Economic Research-Ekonomska Zivanja, 1(32); 982-1000. [DOI:10.1080/1331677X.2019.1585272]
25. Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eichler, C., Fischer, M., & Hennhofer, A. (2015). Do People Know About Privacy and Data Protection Strategies? Towards the "Online Privacy Literacy Scale" (OPLIS). Reforming European data protection law. Law, Governance and Technology Series: Springer, Dordrecht. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14]
26. Tummon, N. & McKinnon, D. (2018). Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy: A national study. Library and Information Science Research, 2(40); 86-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2018.05.002]
27. Turkmen, A, Ahmadi, M. (2007). Causes unethical issues in information systems. Tehran: 2th Regional Conference on Ethics and Information Technology. (In Persian).
28. Yao, M., Rice, R. E., & Wallis, K. (2007). Predicting user concerns about online privacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 5(58); 710-722. [DOI:10.1002/asi.20530]
29. Zavaraghi, R. (2009). Public libraries and their role in the cultural engineering of society. Cultural Engineering, 3(29 & 30); 41-58. (In Persian(
30. Zimmer, M. (2014). Librarians' attitudes regarding information and Internet privacy. The Library Quarterly, 2(84); 123-151. [DOI:10.1086/675329]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Human Information Interaction

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb