1. Abedi, J. (1993). Creativity and new ways of measuring it. Journal of Psychological Research, 182(2), 13-15.

2. Adams, M. (2010). The practical primacy of questions in action learning. San Francisco: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. [DOI:10.1057/9780230250741_7]

3. Althuizen, N., Wierenga, B., & Rossiter, J. (2010). The validity of two brief measure of creative ability. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 53-61. [DOI:10.1080/10400410903579577]

4. Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., & Vaezi, S (2016). Blog-integrated writing with blog-buddies: EAP learners' writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 225-252. [DOI:10.1177/0735633115615588]

5. Bai, H. (2009). Facilitating students' critical thinking in online discussion: An instructor's experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 156-164.

6. Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 25-42. [DOI:10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554]

7. Bhattacharya, A., & Chauhan, K. (2010). Augmenting learner autonomy through blogging. ELT Journal, 64(4), 376-384. [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccq002]

8. Blackstone, B., Spiri, J., & Naganuma, N. (2007). Blogs in English language teaching and learning: pedagogical uses and student responses. Reflection on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-20.

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]

10. Chuska, K. (1995). Improving classroom questions. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

11. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12. Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. [DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13]

13. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers and Education 56(2), 441-451. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005]

14. Ducate, C. L., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: from blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28. [DOI:10.1080/09588220701865474]

15. Eftekhari, M., Sotoudehnama, E., & Marandi, S. S. (2016). Computer-aided argument mapping in an EFL setting: Does technology precede traditional paper and pencil approach in developing critical thinking? Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 339-357. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-016-9431-z]

16. Erwin, T. D. (2000). The npec sourcebook on assessment, volume 1: definitions and assessment methods for critical thinking, problem solving, and writing. Harrisonburg, VA: Center for Assessment and Research Studies, James Madison University.

17. Facione, P.A. (1990). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test-College Level: Factors predictive of CT skills (Report No. 2). US: California Academic Press.

18. Hashemi, M. R., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40, 37-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2012.01.009]

19. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Network-based language teaching. In N. V. Deusen-Scholl, & S. May (Ed.), Second and foreign language education (pp. 197-211), New York: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_30]

20. Khalili, H., & Hossein Zadeh, M. (2003). Investigation of reliability, validity and normality of Persian version of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test; Form B (CCTST). Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 29-32.

21. Khodamorady, K., Saidozakerin, M., Alavi Majd, H., Yaghmaei, F., & Shahabi, M. (2005). Translation and psychometric characteristics of California Critical Thinking Skill Test-Form B. Journal of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, 55, 12-19.

22. Kirton, M. J. (2003). Adaption-innovation: in the context of diversity and change. New York, NY: Routledge.

23. Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212-227. [DOI:10.1017/S095834401000008X]

24. Lindley, D. (1993). This rough magic. Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvey.

25. Loveless, A. (2007). Creativity, new technologies and learning: an update. Bristol: Futurelab.

26. McKim, C. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202-222. [DOI:10.1177/1558689815607096]

27. McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Educations and Teaching International, 46(2), 147-160. [DOI:10.1080/14703290902843778]

28. Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2015). Blogs and the development of plurilingual and intercultural competence: report of a co-actional approach in Portuguese foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 220-240. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2013.818556]

29. Mishra, R. C. (2007). Teaching styles. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.

30. Mulnix, J. W. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464-479. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x]

31. Peppler, K. A., & Solomou, M. (2011). Building creativity: collaborative learning and creativity in social media environment. On the Horizon, 19(1), 13-23. [DOI:10.1108/10748121111107672]

32. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89-106.

33. Roy, D. (2014). Website analysis as a tool for task-based language learning and higher-order thinking in an EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 395-421. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2012.751549]

34. Shakirova, D. M. (2007). Technology for the shaping of college students' and upper-grade students' critical thinking. Russian Education & Society, 49(9), 42-52. [DOI:10.2753/RES1060-9393490905]

35. Sim, J. W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: a review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 151-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.01.001]

36. Sun, Y. (2009). Voice blog: an exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 13(2), 88-103.

37. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. [DOI:10.1177/2345678906292430]

38. Torrance, E.P. (1990). The Torrance test of creative thinking norms-technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A &B. Bensenville. IL: Scholastica Testing Service, Inc.

39. Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a foreign language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126-143. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2011.639784]

40. Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: what does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412-430. [DOI:10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430]

41. Yakut, A. D., & Aydin, S. (2017). An experimental study on the effects of the use of blogs on EFL reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-16. [DOI:10.1080/17501229.2015.1006634]