1. Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9-37. [DOI:10.1177/1362168811423339]

2. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp.259-302). University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

3. Andringa, S., Glopper, K., & Hacquebord, H. (2011). Effect of explicit and instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 61(3), 868-903. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x]

4. Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgments of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning, 29(1), 81-103. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01053.x]

6. Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247–271. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263110000756]

7. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. [DOI:10.1093/applin/1.1.1]

8. Celce-Murica, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.

9. De Graaff, R. (1997). The Experanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249-276. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263197002064]

10. De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M. H. Long, & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726-775). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. [DOI:10.1002/9781444315783.ch38]

11. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379-410. [DOI:10.1017/S027226310001425X]

12. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 313-349). Oxford: Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9780470756492.ch11]

13. De Keyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. Long, & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119-138). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444315783.ch8]

14. De la Fuente, M. (2009). The role of pedagogical tasks and focus on form in acquisition of discourse markers by advanced learners. In R. P. Leow, H. Campos, & D. Lardiere (Eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and acquisition (pp. 211-221). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

15. Douglas, D. (1998). Testing methods in context-based second language research. In L. Bachman, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 141–155).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16. Douglas, D. (2001). Performance consistency in second language acquisition and language testing: A conceptual gap. Second Language Research, 17(4), 442-456. [DOI:10.1177/026765830101700408]

17. Doughty, C. J., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form acquisition. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second, TESOL Quarterly 27(1), 91-113. [DOI:10.2307/3586953]

19. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, supplement 1, 1-46. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x]

20. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x]

21. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263105050096]

22. Ellis, R. (2008). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky, & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 437-455). Oxford: Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9780470694138.ch31]

23. Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

24. Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2007). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005): Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 119-126. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263107070052]

25. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Edler, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

26. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27. Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 269-297. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263114000850]

28. Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 423-449. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263113000041]

29. Han, Y., & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 1-23. [DOI:10.1177/136216889800200102]

30. Hernández, T. A. (2008). The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students' use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665-675.

31. Hernández, T. A. (2011). Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 159-182. [DOI:10.1177/1362168810388694]

32. Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263105050084]

33. Izumi, S. (2003). Visual input enhancement as focus on form. Sophia Linguistica, 13, 1-30.

34. Klapper, J., & Rees, J. (2003). Reviewing the case for explicit grammar instruction in the university foreign language learning context. Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 285-314. [DOI:10.1191/1362168803lr128oa]

35. Lee, S., & Huang, H. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 307-331. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263108080479]

36. Leow, R., Egi, T., Nuevo, A. M., & Tsai, Y.-C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning 13(2), 1-16.

37. Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 94-112). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

38. Loewen, S., Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2009). The incidental acquisition of third person -s as implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 262-280). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

39. Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154-193. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x]

40. Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933-947. [DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00119]

41. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145. [DOI:10.1017/S0267190504000066]

42. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. [DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00136]

43. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis (6th Ed.). Open University Press: New York.

44. Philp, J. (2009). Pathways to proficiency: Learning experiences and attainment in implicit and explicit knowledge of English as a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 167-193). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

45. Radwan, A. A. (2005). The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33(1), 69-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2004.06.007]

46. Reinders, H., & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 281-302). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

47. Rosa, E. E., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness and type of feedback on Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 192-217. [DOI:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00225.x]

48. Scott, M. V. (1990). Explicit and implicit grammar teaching strategies: New empirical data. The French Review, 63(5), 779-789.

49. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 205-224. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263100011967]

50. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263-308. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x]

51. Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65(4), 860-895. [DOI:10.1111/lang.12138]

52. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.

53. Tode, T. (2007). Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: The learning of the English copula be before and after the introduction of the auxiliary be. Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 11-30. [DOI:10.1177/1362168806072398]

54. Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59-95. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263115000455]

55. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

56. Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners' performance. System, 37(1), 82-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2008.04.004]

57. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7(2), 133-161. [DOI:10.1177/026765839100700205]

58. Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 671–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

59. Wong, W. (2003). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 14, 109-132.

60. Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learners' use of interactional discourse markers. In K. Rose, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 223-244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524797.016]

61. Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners' implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 457-486. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263114000370]

62. Zhuo, C. (2010). Explicit recast, implicit recast and the acquisition of English noun plural: A comparative study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(6), 55-70.