1. Abbasi, A., & Fatemi, M.A. (2015). On the effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learner acquisition of English tenses. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(4), 222-236.

2. Ableeva, R.(2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

3. Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading comprehension in different proficiency levels. Language Testing in Asia, 2 (4), 101-122. [DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-2-4-101]

4. Alavi, S. M., Kaivanpanah, S., & Shabani, K. (2011). Group dynamic assessment: An inventory of mediational strategies for teaching listening. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(4), 27-58.

5. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x]

6. Antón, M. (2003). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C.

7. Azarian, F., Nourdad, N., & Nouri, N. (2016). The effect of dynamic assessment on elementary EFL learners' overall language attainment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 203. [DOI:10.17507/tpls.0601.27]

8. Barber, B. K. (2005). Positive interpersonal and intrapersonal functioning: An assessment of measures among adolescents. In What Do Children Need to Flourish? (pp. 147-161). Springer, Boston, MA. [DOI:10.1007/0-387-23823-9_10]

9. Budoff, M. (1968). A learning potential assessment procedure: Rationale and supporting data. Proceedings from the First Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency. Surrey, England: Michael Jackson (pp. 569- 570).

10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209, 240.

12. Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: a critical examination of constructs and practices. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 813-829. [DOI:10.1111/modl.12352]

13. Davin, K. J., & Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals, 46 (1), 5-22.doi: 10.1111/flan.12012 [DOI:10.1111/flan.12012]

14. Davin, K. J., Herazo, J. D., & Sagre, A. (2017). Learning to mediate: Teacher appropriation of dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 632-651. [DOI:10.1177/1362168816654309]

15. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Apple (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Albex.

16. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

17. Erben, T., Ban, R., & Summers, R. (2008). Changing examination structures within a college of education: The application of dynamic assessment in pre-service ESOL endorsement courses in Florida. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, 87-114.

18. Fani, T., & Rashtchi, M. (2015). Dynamic assessment of reading comprehension ability: Group or individualized. Education Journal, 4(6), 325-331. [DOI:10.11648/j.edu.20150406.11]

19. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. A., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Scott Foresman & Co.

20. Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273. [DOI:10.2307/3588504]

21. Guk, I., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11 (3), 281-299. [DOI:10.1177/1362168807077561]

22. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2010). The practice of qualitative research. Sage.

23. Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37-56). Springer, Dordrecht.‏ [DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2]

24. Hidri, S. (2014). Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context. Language Testing in Asia, 4(4), 1-19. [DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-4-4]

25. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers' professional development. Routledge.‏ [DOI:10.4324/9781315641447]

26. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 1, 1-26. [DOI:10.4324/9781315624747-1]

27. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33. [DOI:10.1177/1362168810383328]

28. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49- 72.‏ [DOI:10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872]

29. Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213. [DOI:10.1002/tesq.153]

30. Lidz, C. S. (2002). Mediated learning experience (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment. School Psychology International, 23(1), 68-84. [DOI:10.1177/0143034302023001731]

31. Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, S. M. Miller (Eds.). In Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

32. Mardani,M., & Tavakoli,M. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension: The effect of adding a dynamic assessment component on EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3) , 688-696. [DOI:10.4304/jltr.2.3.688-696]

33. McNeil, L. (2016). Understanding and addressing the challenges of learning computer-mediated dynamic assessment: A teacher education study. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 289-309. [DOI:10.1177/1362168816668675]

34. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.

35. Miri, M., Alibakhshi, G., Kushki, A., & Bavarsad, P. S. (2017). Going beyond one-to-one mediation in zone of proximal development (ZPD): concurrent and cumulative group dynamic assessment. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1-24. [DOI:10.32601/ejal.461025]

36. Panahi, P., Birjandi, P., & Azabdaftari, B. (2013). Toward a sociocultural approach to feedback provision in L2 writing classrooms: the alignment of dynamic assessment and teacher error feedback. Language Testing in Asia, 3(13). 1-10. [DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-3-13]

37. Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL quarterly, 43(3), 471-491. [DOI:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x]

38. Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French. Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University: The Graduate School Department of French and Francophone Studies.

39. Poehner, M. E., Davin, K. J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2017). Dynamic assessment. Language Testing and Assessment,4, 243-256. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_18]

40. Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2017). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 332-357.‏ [DOI:10.1002/tesq.308]

41. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. [DOI:10.1177/1362168813482935]

42. Poehner, M.E., & Lantolf, J.P. (2005). Dynamic Assessment in the Language Classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9 (3), 233-265. [DOI:10.1191/1362168805lr166oa]

43. Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner reciprocity to mediation. Language testing, 32(3), 337-357. [DOI:10.1177/0265532214560390]

44. Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and sociocultural theory, 2(2), 185- 208. [DOI:10.1558/lst.v2i2.25956]

45. Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotkian Perspectives (pp. 183-204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46. Saniei, A. (2012). Dynamic assessment: A call for change in assessment. The Asian EFL Journal, 59 (4), 4-19.

47. Saniei, A., Birjandi, P., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2015). On the practicality of group dynamic assessment: A seminal enterprise deserving closer scrutiny. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 39-46. [DOI:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.39]

48. Shabani, K. (2018). Group Dynamic Assessment of L2 Learners' Writing Abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 129-149.

49. Shabani K. (2014). Dynamic assessment of L2 listening comprehension in transcendence tasks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1729-1737. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.600]

50. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating pedagogy 2014 (pp. 1-37). Open University.

51. Shrestha, P., & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003]

52. Siwathaworn, P., & Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). The impact of dynamic assessment on tertiary EFL students' speaking skills. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 142-155.

53. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211. [DOI:10.1177/136216889700100302]

54. Sternberg, R.J. (2000). Prologue to dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. In Dynamic assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. C. Lidz and J. G. Elliott (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

55. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge university press.

56. Tabatabaee, M., Alidoust, M., & Sarkeshikian, A. H. (2018). The Effect of Interventionist and Cumulative Group Dynamic Assessments on EFL Learners' Writing Accuracy. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(1), 1-13. [DOI:10.14744/alrj.2018.36854]

57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

58. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

59. Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155-168. [DOI:10.1093/elt/cct068]