دوره ۹، شماره ۴ - ( دوره نهم، شماره چهارم، زمستان ۱۴۰۰ )                   جلد ۹ شماره ۴ صفحات ۵۳-۳۵ | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hallajian A, Dehghani-Arani F, Rostami R, Bayat M ‌, Rahmati Y. The role of temporo-parietal junction on implicit mentalizing in autism spectrum disorder: a theta-burst stimulation study. CPJ 2022; 9 (4) : 50
URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3483-fa.html
حلّاجیان امیرهمایون، دهقانی آرانی فاطمه، رستمی رضا، بیات مژده، رحمتی یاسمین. نقش ناحیه‌ اتصال آهیانه‌ای-گیجگاهی روی ذهنی‌سازی ضمنی در اختلال طیف اتیسم: یک مطالعه‌ی تحریک تتابرست. فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی. ۱۴۰۰; ۹ (۴) :۳۵-۵۳

URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-۱-۳۴۸۳-fa.html


دانشگاه تهران ، f.dehghani.a@ut.ac.ir
چکیده:   (۵۴۹۶ مشاهده)
یکی از نواحی مهم مغزی درگیر در فرآیند نظریه ذهن، ناحیه اتصال آهیانه‌ای-گیجگاهی راست (rTPJ) مغز است که مطالعات متعددی نقش این ناحیه از مغز را در فرآیند ذهنی‌سازی و کاهش فعالیت آن را اختلال طیف اتیسم نشان داده‌اند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه‌ علّی بین عملکرد این ناحیه از مغز و توانایی ذهنی‌سازی انجام شد. پژوهش حاضر از از نوع نیمه‌آزمایشی یک‌سرکور با شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها به صورت اندازه‌گیری مکرر است. ۹ کودک و نوجوان مبتلا به اتیسم با کارکرد بالا به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس، به‌وسیله ابزار مقیاس نمره‌گذاری اتیسم گیلیام (GARS)، مقیاس پاسخگویی اجتماعی (SRS) و آزمون هوش استنفورد بینه (SB) انتخاب و وارد مطالعه شدند. سپس در سه جلسه‌ تحریک تتابرست پیوسته (cTBS)، تحریک تتابرست متناوب (iTBS) و تحریک شم با ترتیب تصادفی شرکت کردند. بلافاصله بعد از هر جلسه‌ی تحریکی توسط یک ازمون کامپیوتری ملاک‌های مربوط به ذهنی‌سازی ضمنی آزمودنی‌ها اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج تحلیل واریانس اندازه‌گیری مکرر نشان داد که جلسات تحریکی در مقایسه با جلسات شم باعث بهبود توانایی ذهنی‌سازی ضمنی شدند. به نظر می‌رسد بین فعالیت rTPJ و توانایی ذهنی‌سازی ضمنی در اتیسم رابطه‌ی علّی وجود دارد.
شماره‌ی مقاله: ۵۰
متن کامل [PDF 1588 kb]   (۱۲۷۰ دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: روانشناسی- نوروسایکولوژی بالینی
دریافت: 1400/6/20 | پذیرش: 1400/11/13 | انتشار: 1400/11/17

فهرست منابع
1. Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953-970. [DOI:10.1037/a0016923]
2. Bardi, L., Desmet, C., & Brass, M. (2019). Spontaneous Theory of Mind is reduced for nonhuman-like agents as compared to human-like agents. Psychological Research, 83(7), 1571-1580. [DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-1000-0]
3. Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Nijhof, A., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2017). Brain activation for spontaneous and explicit false belief tasks overlaps: New fMRI evidence on belief processing and violation of expectation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsw143]
4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The Autistic Child's Theory of Mind: a Case of Specific Developmental Delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 285-297. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x]
5. Bergmann, T. O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020). Inferring causality from noninvasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(2). [DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01591]
6. Beynel, L., Appelbaum, L. G., Luber, B., Crowell, C. A., Hilbig, S. A., Lim, W., … Deng, Z.-D. (2019). Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018 [DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018]
7. Boccadoro, S., Cracco, E., Hudson, A. R., Bardi, L., Nijhof, A. D., Wiersema, J. R., … Mueller, S. C. (2019). Defining the neural correlates of spontaneous theory of mind (ToM): An fMRI multi-study investigation. NeuroImage, 203(March), 116193. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116193]
8. Bowler, D. M. (1992). "Theory of Mind" in Asperger's Syndrome Dermot M. Bowler. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb01962.x]
9. Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S. (2009). Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2359-2367. [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2009.0066]
10. Bukowski, H., Tik, M., Silani, G., Ruff, C. C., Windischberger, C., & Lamm, C. (2020). When differences matter: rTMS/fMRI reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy. Cortex, 128, 143-161. [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.009]
11. Callenmark, B., Kjellin, L., Rönnqvist, L., & Bölte, S. (2014). Explicit versus implicit social cognition testing in autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 18(6), 684-693. [DOI:10.1177/1362361313492393]
12. Carruthers, P. (2017). Mindreading in adults: evaluating two-systems views. Synthese, 194(3), 673-688. [DOI:10.1007/s11229-015-0792-3]
13. Chung, S. W., Hill, A. T., Rogasch, N. C., Hoy, K. E., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2016). Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 63, 43-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008]
14. Cieza, A., Causey, K., Kamenov, K., Hanson, S. W., Chatterji, S., & Vos, T. (2020). Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396(10267), 2006-2017. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0]
15. Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). Social responsiveness scale: SRS-2. Western Psychological Services Torrance, CA.
16. Costa, A., Torriero, S., Oliveri, M., & Caltagirone, C. (2008). Prefrontal and temporo-parietal involvement in taking others ' perspective : TMS evidence, 19, 71-74. [DOI:10.1155/2008/694632]
17. Crescentini, C., Di Bucchianico, M., Fabbro, F., & Urgesi, C. (2015). Excitatory stimulation of the right inferior parietal cortex lessens implicit religiousness/spirituality. Neuropsychologia, 70. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.016]
18. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist, 13(6), 580-593. [DOI:10.1177/1073858407304654]
19. Demehri F, Khatibi T, Azizi M. Comparison of Executive Functions and Learning Strategies among Autistic Students with High and Low Academic Performance. JCP. 2020; 8 (3) :86-96
20. Der, G., & Deary, I. J. (2003). IQ, reaction time and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 31(5). [DOI:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00189-7]
21. Deschrijver, E., Bardi, L., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2016). Behavioral measures of implicit theory of mind in adults with high functioning autism. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1-4), 192-202. [DOI:10.1080/17588928.2015.1085375]
22. Di Lazzaro, V., Pilato, F., Saturno, E., Oliviero, A., Dileone, M., Mazzone, P., … Rothwell, J. C. (2005a). Theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. Journal of Physiology, 565(3), 945-950. [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087288]
23. Di Lazzaro, V., Pilato, F., Saturno, E., Oliviero, A., Dileone, M., Mazzone, P., … Rothwell, J. C. (2005b). Theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. Journal of Physiology, 565(3). [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087288]
24. Döhnel, K., Schuwerk, T., Meinhardt, J., Sodian, B., Hajak, G., & Sommer, M. (2012). Functional activity of the right temporo-parietal junction and of the medial prefrontal cortex associated with true and false belief reasoning. NeuroImage. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.073]
25. Eddy, C. M. (2016). Neuropsychologia The junction between self and other ? Temporo-parietal dysfunction in neuropsychiatry. Neuropsychologia, 89, 465-477. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.030]
26. El Kaddouri, R., Bardi, L., De Bremaeker, D., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2019). Measuring spontaneous mentalizing with a ball detection task: putting the attention-check hypothesis by Phillips and colleagues (2015) to the test. Psychological Research, (0123456789). [DOI:10.1007/s00426-019-01181-7]
27. Enticott, P. G., Barlow, K., Guastella, A. J., Licari, M. K., Rogasch, N. C., Middeldorp, C. M., … Fitzgerald, P. B. (2021). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open, 11(7), e046830. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046830]
28. Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: beyond "theory of mind." Cognition, 50(1-3), 115-132. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8]
29. Giardina, A., Caltagirone, C., & Oliveri, M. (2015). The temporoparietal junction modulates self-Other motor representations during online and offline social motor conflict: An rTMS study. NeuroReport, 26(1), 1-5. [DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000282]
30. Gilliam, J. (1995). Gilliam autism rating scale : examiner's manual. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
31. Hamada, M., Murase, N., Hasan, A., Balaratnam, M., & Rothwell, J. C. (2013). The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 23(7). [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhs147]
32. Hill, E. L., & Frith, U. (2003). Understanding autism: insights from mind and brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 281-289. [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2002.1209]
33. Jannati, A., Block, G., Oberman, L. M., Rotenberg, A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2017). Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults. Clinical Neurophysiology (Vol. 128). International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.023]
34. Jannati, A., Block, G., Ryan, M. A., Kaye, H. L., Kayarian, F. B., Bashir, S., … Rotenberg, A. (2020). Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation in Children With High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typically Developing Children . Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience . Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnint.2020.00013 [DOI:10.3389/fnint.2020.00013]
35. Joshi, G., Wozniak, J., Petty, C., Martelon, M. K., Fried, R., Bolfek, A., … Biederman, J. (2013). Psychiatric comorbidity and functioning in a clinically referred population of adults with autism spectrum disorders: A comparative study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. [DOI:10.1007/s10803-012-1679-5]
36. Karalunas, S. L., Geurts, H. M., Konrad, K., Bender, S., & Nigg, J. T. (2014). Annual research review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 55(6), 685-710. [DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12217]
37. Kennedy, D. P., & Courchesne, E. (2008). Functional abnormalities of the default network during self- and other-reflection in autism. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsn011]
38. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G., Broussard, C., Wolf, T., & Niehorster, D. (2007). What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception. [DOI:10.1068/v070821]
39. Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others' beliefs in human infants and adults. Science. [DOI:10.1126/science.1190792]
40. Krall, S. C., Rottschy, C., Oberwelland, E., Bzdok, D., Fox, P. T., Eickhoff, S. B., … Konrad, K. (2015). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function. [DOI:10.1007/s00429-014-0803-z]
41. Krall, Sarah C., Volz, L. J., Oberwelland, E., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., & Konrad, K. (2016). The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 796-807. [DOI:10.1002/hbm.23068]
42. LaGasse, A. B. (2017). Social outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder: a review of music therapy outcomes. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 8, 23-32. [DOI:10.2147/PROM.S106267]
43. Mannion, A., & Leader, G. (2013). Comorbidity in autism spectrum disorder: A literature review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. [DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.09.006]
44. McAllister, C. J., Rönnqvist, K. C., Stanford, I. M., Woodhall, G. L., Furlong, P. L., & Hall, S. D. (2013). Oscillatory beta activity mediates neuroplastic effects of motor cortex stimulation in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(18), 7919-7927. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5624-12.2013]
45. Murdaugh, D. L., Nadendla, K. D., & Kana, R. K. (2014). Differential role of temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex in causal inference in autism: An independent component analysis. Neuroscience Letters. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.03.051]
46. Murphy, C. M., Wilson, C. E., Robertson, D. M., Ecker, C., Daly, E. M., Hammond, N., … McAlonan, G. M. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: diagnosis, management, and health services development. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1669-1686. [DOI:10.2147/NDT.S65455]
47. Nijhof, A. D., Bardi, L., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2018). Brain activity for spontaneous and explicit mentalizing in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An fMRI study. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18(February), 475-484. [DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.016]
48. Nijhof, A. D., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2017). Spontaneous mentalizing in neurotypicals scoring high versus low on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Research, 258(October), 15-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.060]
49. Oberman, L. M., Enticott, P. G., Casanova, M. F., Rotenberg, A., Pascual-Leone, A., Mccracken, J. T., … Wall, C. (2016). Transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: Challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research. Autism Research, 9(2), 184-203. [DOI:10.1002/aur.1567]
50. Oberman, L. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Rotenberg, A. (2016). Brain Stimulation to Understand and Modulate the Autism Spectrum. Pediatric Brain Stimulation: Mapping and Modulating The Developing Brain. Elsevier Inc. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-802001-2.00013-8]
51. Oberman, L. M., & Rotenberg, A. (2014). Modulation of corticospinal excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, 8(August), 1-8. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00627]
52. Oberman LM, Pascual-Leone A. Cortical plasticity: a proposed mechanism by which g nomic factors lead to the behavioral and neurological phenotype of autism spectrum and psychotic spectrum disorders. Behav Brain Sci. 2008;31:241-320. [DOI:10.1017/S0140525X08004378]
53. Obeso, I., Robles, N., Muñoz-Marrón, E., & Redolar-Ripoll, D. (2013). Dissociating the Role of the pre-SMA in Response Inhibition and Switching: A Combined Online and Offline TMS Approach . Frontiers in Human Neuroscience . Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00150 [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00150]
54. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. [DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00076512]
55. Quesque, F., & Brass, M. (2019). The Role of the Temporoparietal Junction in Self-Other Distinction. Brain Topography, 1-49. [DOI:10.1007/s10548-019-00737-5]
56. Quesque, F., & Rossetti, Y. (2020). What Do Theory-of-Mind Tasks Actually Measure? Theory and Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 384-396. [DOI:10.1177/1745691619896607]
57. Salehinejad, M. A., Paknia, N., Hosseinpour, A. H., Yavari, F., Vicario, C. M., Nitsche, M. A., & Nejati, V. (2021). Contribution of the right temporoparietal junction and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to theory of mind in autism: A randomized, sham-controlled tDCS study. Autism Research, 14(8). [DOI:10.1002/aur.2538]
58. Salehinejad, M. A., Wischnewski, M., Ghanavati, E., Mosayebi-Samani, M., Kuo, M.-F., & Nitsche, M. A. (2021). Cognitive functions and underlying parameters of human brain physiology are associated with chronotype. Nature Communications, 12(1), 4672. [DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-24885-0]
59. Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2012a). Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology, 22(23), 2274-2277. [DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018]
60. Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2012b). Enhancing Social Ability by Stimulating Right Temporoparietal Junction Report Enhancing Social Ability by Stimulating Right Temporoparietal Junction. Current Biology, 22(23), 2274-2277. [DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018]
61. Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Functional lateralization of temporoparietal junction - imitation inhibition, visual perspective-taking and theory of mind. European Journal of Neuroscience, 42(8), 2527-2533. [DOI:10.1111/ejn.13036]
62. Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2013). A temporally sustained implicit theory of mind deficit in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition, 129(2), 410-417. [DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.004]
63. Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009]
64. Senju, A. (2013). Atypical development of spontaneous social cognition in autism spectrum disorders. Brain and Development, 35(2), 96-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.braindev.2012.08.002]
65. Senju, A., Southgate, V., Miura, Y., Matsui, T., Hasegawa, T., Tojo, Y., … Csibra, G. (2010). Absence of spontaneous action anticipation by false belief attribution in children with autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 22(2), 353-360. [DOI:10.1017/S0954579410000106]
66. Shahrivar, Z., Tehrani-Doost, M., Davoodi, E., Hosseiniani, T., Tarighatnia, H., Momen, S., … Hajirezaei, S. (2020). The reliability of the social responsiveness scale-2 in an Iranian typically developing group of children. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 15(1). [DOI:10.18502/ijps.v15i1.2438]
67. Sowden, S., & Catmur, C. (2015). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the control of imitation. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 1107-1113. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bht306]
68. Uddin, L. Q., Molnar-szakacs, I., Zaidel, E., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). rTMS to the right inferior parietal lobule disrupts self - other discrimination, 65-71. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsl003]
69. Valchev, N., Tidoni, E., Hamilton, A. F. d. C., Gazzola, V., & Avenanti, A. (2017). Primary somatosensory cortex necessary for the perception of weight from other people's action: A continuous theta-burst TMS experiment. NeuroImage, 152, 195-206. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.075]
70. Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping. [DOI:10.1002/hbm.20547]
71. Van Overwalle, F., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2013). Implicit and explicit social mentalizing: Dual processes driven by a shared neural network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00560]
72. van Veluw, S. J., & Chance, S. A. (2014). Differentiating between self and others: An ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies of self-recognition and theory of mind. Brain Imaging and Behavior. [DOI:10.1007/s11682-013-9266-8]
73. Volkmar, F. R., & Reichow, B. (2013). Autism in DSM-5: Progress and challenges. Molecular Autism. [DOI:10.1186/2040-2392-4-13]
74. White, S. J., Frith, U., Rellecke, J., Al-Noor, Z., & Gilbert, S. J. (2014). Autistic adolescents show atypical activation of the brain's mentalizing system even without a prior history of mentalizing problems. Neuropsychologia. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.013]
75. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5]
76. Young, L., Albert, J., Hauser, M., Pascual-leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0914826107]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb