Volume 24, Issue 75 (12-2024)
jgs 2024, 24(75): 274-291 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
khatiri K, ghazi I, hasani N. (2024). Pattern of the impact of social capital on crisis management performance. jgs. 24(75), 274-291. doi:10.61186/jgs.24.75.11
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3974-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3974-en.html
1- isfahan univeisity, kh_nilo78@yahoo.com , kh_nilo78@yahoo.com
2- shahid beheshti university, Iranghazi2020@ yahoo.com
3- assistant professor, hassaniamoozeshi@gmail.com
2- shahid beheshti university, Iranghazi2020@ yahoo.com
3- assistant professor, hassaniamoozeshi@gmail.com
Abstract: (3813 Views)
Natural disasters cause severe financial and human damage. Crisis management means purposefully shifting the flow of affairs in a controllable manner with the intention of returning things to pre-crisis conditions as soon as possible. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to present a model of social capital development in urban water crisis management.The study method is descriptive-survey. In order to collect information, interviews and questionnaires were used and for data analysis, SPSS software, AHP analysis method, regression and T were used. Statistical community including crisis and water crisis managers; Also, all residents of Karaj were in the period between 1396 and 1395, which was estimated as a statistical sample of 350 people using Cochran's table.The results of statistical analysis showed that from the perspective of statistical sample individuals, the amount of social capital was lower than the desired level. Also, the relationship between social capital indicators was significant. Also, the results of couple comparison of main criteria using AHP analysis prioritized the indicators of social trust with 0.433 coefficient, incentive policy criterion and change in attitude space with 0.355 coefficient, criterion The interactive and value infrastructure of the society with a coefficient of 0.277, the interaction with a coefficient of 0.203, and finally the criterion of non-alienation with the government with a coefficient of 0.199 showed the fifth priority.The study shows that countries' ability to deal with crises has a lot to do with crisis management policy, promoting social capital in society and developing a spirit of cooperation and motivating participation among the people is one of the important solutions.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
References
1. اندیشمند، ویدا (1388). شناسايي مؤلفه‌های سرمايه اجتماعي، فصلنامه رهبري و مديريت آموزشي. دوره 3. شماره 2.
2. آشفته، پریسا سادات (1398)، توسعه رویکرد خاکستری در مدیریت منابع آب با استفاده از شاخص‌های ریسک. دوره 15، شماره 3، پاییز 1398، صفحه 132-120.
3. بورديو، پي ير (1381)، " نظريه كنش "، ترجمه: سيد مرتضي مردی‌ها، تهران: نقش و نگار.صص 215-214.
4. پاتنام، روبرت (۱۳۸۰). دموكراسي و سنت‌های مدني، ترجمه: دلفروز، تهران، انتشارات سلام. صص 42-40.
5. پورگلزاری، صادق و رشادت جو، حمیده، (1397).، بررسی رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی و جمع سپاری، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی دستاوردهای نوین پژوهشی در علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی و فرهنگی، کرج https://civilica.com/doc/812995
6. تنهايي، حسين ابوالحسن (1384)، تحليل نظري زمینه‌های جامعه‌شناسی معرفت. بورديو، آشتيان. فصلنامه تخصصي جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي آشتيان، سال اول، شماره 3.
7. توسلی، غلامعباس و موسوی، مرضیه (1382)، سرمایه در نظریات کلاسیک و جدید با تأکید بر نظریه‌های سرمایه سطح و توزیع سرمایه اجتماعی استان‌ها، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی رفاه. زمستان 1385. دوره 6. شماره 23.
8. خليلي عراقي، مريم، يقين لو مهرانگي.(1386). بحران و مديريت بحران. بررسي آثار مثبت و منفي بحران در سازمان‌ها. پايگاه مقالات مديريت.
9. سعادت، رحمان (1386)، تخمین سطح و توزیع سرمایه اجتماعی استان‌ها، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، سال ششم، شماره 23، ص 177.
10. سیدمن، استیون (1388)، کشاکش آراء در جامعه‌شناسی، هادی جلیلی، تهران، نی، ص 198.
11. صیدایی اسکندر (1388)، دیباچه‌ای بر سرمایه اجتماعی و رابطه آن با مؤلفه‌های توسعه اجتماعی در ایران.
12. كلمن، جيمز (1377)، "بنيادهاي نظريه اجتماعي"، ترجمه: منوچهر صبوري، تهران: نشر ني. ص 358.
13. گلفام پروین، آشفته پریساسادات. توسعه رویکرد خاکستری در مدیریت منابع آب با استفاده از شاخص‌های ریسک. تحقیقات منابع آب ایران؛15(3):120-132. https://sid.ir/paper/100375/fa
14. الواني، مهدي؛ شيرواني، عليرضا (1385)، سرمايه اجتماعي مفاهيم، نظریه‌ها و کاربردها، انتشارات ماني. صص 112-104.
15. Breffle WS, Muralidharan D, Donovan RP, Liu F, Mukherjee A, Jin (2013)Socioeconomic evaluation of the impact of natural resource stressors on human-use services in the Great Lakes environment: a LakeMichigan case study. Resour Policy 38:152-161. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.10.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.10.004]
16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.10.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.10.004]
17. Case, Published in Putnam, Robert D,.(2002). Democracy in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195150899.001.0001/acprof-9780195150896.
19. Coleman,j.s.(1988),Social Capital in the Creation of humancapital, American Journal of Sociology; 94:95-120. [DOI:10.1086/228943]
20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243?seq=1
21. Danchev, A. (2006). Social capital and sustainable behavior of the firm. Industrial Management and Data System, Vol. 106, No. 7,PP. 953-965. [DOI:10.1108/02635570610688878]
22. Fussell, H. (2006). The Relationship Between Social Capital, Transaction Costs, And Organizational Outcomes. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol.11. No. 2, PP. 148-161 [DOI:10.1108/13563280610661688]
23. https://www.publicissapient.com/insights/three_tips_for_a_successful_customer_data_Platform?utm_source=google&utm_medium=paid-search&utm_campaign=cdp2020.
24. Glaeser, E., D. Laibson, and B. Sacerdote (2000) The Economic Approach to Social Capital, NBER Working Paper No. 7728(Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research). [DOI:10.3386/w7728] []
25. https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/7728.html.
26. Glaeser, Edward L (2001) The Formation of Social Capital, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and evelopment,www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/17/1824983.pdf.
27. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/1824983.pdf.
28. Hasle. P, Kristensen, T, Moller: N, Olesen G (2007) "Organizational Social capital and the relations with quality of work and health",international congress on social capotal and Networks of Trust, 18-20october, university of jyvaskyla, finland. Available at: www.Arbejdmilijo for skning, Dk.
29. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Hasle/publication/267995628_Organisational_social_capital_and_the_relations_with_quality_of_work_and_health_-_a_new_issue_for_research/links/546308340cf2c0c6aec1c331/Organisational-social-capital-and-the-relations-with-quality-of-work-and-health-a-new-issue-for-research.pdf
30. Jeroen Warner et al.(2002)Public Participation inDisaster-Prone Watersheds.Time for Multi-Stakeholder Platforms?
31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40798697_Public_Participation_in_Disaster-prone_Watersheds_Time_for_Multi-stakeholder_Platforms
32. King, N.(2004), Social capital and nonprofit leaders, Nonprofit Management and Leadership,vol.14, No.4.pp.469-479 [DOI:10.1002/nml.48]
33. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2188813
34. Mirchi A, Watkins D (2013) A systems approach to holistic total maximum daily load policy: case of Lake Allegan, Michigan. J Water ResourPlan Manag 139:544-553. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000292. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000292]
35. 273744981_A_Systems_Approach_to_Holistic_Total_Maximum_Daily_Load_Policy_Case_of_Lake_Allegan_Michigan
36. https://docksci.com/a-pollutant-load-hierarchical-allocation-method-integrated-in-an-environmental-c_5a344380d64ab24eba77118e.html
37. Nahapiet, J. 8 Ghoshal, S. (1999) "social capitall, intellectual Tal and the organizational advantage." Academy of Management Review, vol 23.No (20). [DOI:10.2307/259373]
38. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ce44/e72939269826849a2c72eb17cad11fd937fe.pdf.
39. Plum N, Schulte-Wülwer-Leidig A (2014) From a sewer into a living river: the Rhine between Sandoz and Salmon. Hydrobiologia 729: 95-106. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1433-1. [DOI:10.1007/s10750-012-1433-1]
40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-012-1433-1?shared-article-renderer.
41. Raymond HL (1988) Effects of hydroelectric development and fisheries enhancement on spring and summer chinook salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin. N Am J Fish Manag 8:1-24. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1988)008<0001:EOHDAF>2.3.CO;2
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1988)008<0001:EOHDAF>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8675(1988)0082.3.CO;2]
42. http://bluefish.org/Schaller.pdf
43. Smith, K., and Ward, R. (1998). Floods: physical processes and human impacts, Wiley, Chichester (etc).
44. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13729542612425969742&hl=en&oi=scholarr
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)