Volume 3, Issue 5 (4-2013)
JRSM 2013, 3(5): 35-46 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nourali J, Shafineya P, Shehni Yailagh M. The relationship of coping strategies and performance–goal discrepancy (PGD) with positive and negative effects in sprinter runner of Iranian university students. JRSM 2013; 3 (5) :35-46
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1758-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1758-en.html
Abstract: (7028 Views)
This study examined the relationship between coping strategies and performance–goal discrepancy (PGD) with positive and negative effects before and after the competition. Sixty-two Iranian male sprinter runners, aged from 21 to 26 years, completed the Brief COPE (Carver, 1997) and the PANAS (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) questionnaire two hours before and six hours after the competition. The score performance–goal discrepancy (PGD) achieved from difference of person predicted record and competition record. The results showed that the relationship of problem-focused strategies and negative effect was negative and the relationship of emotion-focused strategies and positive effect was positive before and after the competition. Also the results showed that the relationship of problem-focused strategies and positive effect was positive after the competition. The results of path analysis did not indicated that coping strategies mediated the PGD and negative effect relationship, prior and after the competition.
Keywords: Coping Strategies, Performance–goal discrepancy (PGD), Positive and negative effects, Sprinter runner
Type of Study: Research |
Published: 2013/04/15
Published: 2013/04/15
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
