Volume 10, Issue 19 (8-2020)                   JRSM 2020, 10(19): 105-121 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razavinia M, Parvinpour S, Arsham S. The Effects of the Learning Model, Skilled Model, and Positive Self-review on the Learning of Front Crawl Swimming in Children. JRSM 2020; 10 (19) :105-121
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2467-en.html
1- Kharazmi University , raazavi.majid@gmail.com
2- Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (4303 Views)

One of the main goals of the mission of experts motor learning is maximize the quality of learning experiences and optimize the educational environment .The purpose of this study was focusing on the effects of learning model, skilled model and positive self-review crawl on learning in children aged 9 to 11 years in Alborz Province. Participants of the random and available samples divided into different groups. Thus, Participants of all groups practiced three time in a week which have 20 attempt to practice in every session and totally all the crawl swimming exercises were finished at 12 session. at the end of the twelfth session acquisition test and a week after the end of the last session retention and transfer tests were taken. The dependent variable was the quality of Participants which was performed by swimming instructor-notch swimming using crawl skills assessment Czech list. The results indicate the advantage of the three types of model crawl performance and significant difference between groups in the acquisition, retention and transfer test) p<0/05(.Also, positive self-review and learning model groups was considerably better than skilled model and control group in Acquisition test. Furthermore, skilled model group scores are really higher than the control group. Positive self-review groups had the best performance in the retention and transfer tests in comparison with the other groups (learning model, skilled model and control). After that, learning model group was more effective than the rest of them (skilled model and Control groups). Finally, control groups had lowest performance among all mentioned groups

Full-Text [PDF 1340 kb]   (1092 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: motor behavior
Received: 2017/04/10 | Accepted: 2017/07/1 | Published: 2020/08/31

References
1. Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning: Human kinetics; 1988.
2. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition: Psychology Press; 2014 [DOI:10.4324/9781315740218]
3. Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning: Human kinetics; 1988.
4. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition: Psychology Press; 2014. [DOI:10.4324/9781315740218]
5. McCullagh P, Meyer KN. Learning versus correct models: Influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1997;68(1):56-61. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608866]
6. Dana.amir RsHj. The effect of an observational practice period on learning of vally babminton service. Australian Journalof basic and applied sciences. 2011.
7. Martineau B, Mamede S, St-Onge C, Rikers RM, Schmidt HG. To observe or not to observe peers when learning physical examination skills; that is the question. BMC medical education. 2013;13(1):1. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-13-55]
8. Martens R, Burwitz L, Zuckerman J. Modeling effects on motor performance. Research Quarterly American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1976;47(2):277-91. [DOI:10.1080/10671315.1976.10615372]
9. Zetou E, Tzetzis G, Vernadakis N, KIOUMOURTZOGLOU E. Modeling in learning two volleyball skills. Perceptual and motor skills. 2002;94(3c):1131-42. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2002.94.3c.1131]
10. Holmes P, Calmels C. A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. Journal of motor behavior. 2008;40(5):433-45. [DOI:10.3200/JMBR.40.5.433-445]
11. Starek J, McCullagh P. The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginning swimmers. Sport Psychologist. 1999;13:269-87. [DOI:10.1123/tsp.13.3.269]
12. Dowrick PW. A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and preventive psychology. 2000;8(1):23-39. [DOI:10.1016/S0962-1849(99)80009-2]
13. Dowrick PW, Raeburn JM. Self-modeling: Rapid skill training for children with physical disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 1995;7(1):25-37. [DOI:10.1007/BF02578712]
14. Drazin D. The use of self-modeling to improve motor performance (golf). Dissertation Abstracts International. 1985;46(B):946.
15. Winfrey ML, Weeks DL. Effects of self-modeling on sf-efficacely and balance beam performance. Perceptual and motor skills. 1993;77(3):907-13. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1993.77.3.907]
16. Martini R, Rymal A, Ste-Marie DM. Investigating self-as-a-model techniques and underlying cognitive processes in adults learning the butterfly swim stroke. Int J Sport Sci Eng. 2011;5:242-56.
17. Determining the effect of learning pattern intervention, self-modeling on crawl swimming performance in semi-beginners. Thesis of Shahid Beheshti University. 2015.1-156
18. Parvinpour,the effect of dyad training on learning front crawl swimming. tehran university. 2013 .1-163
19. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DM. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2007;25(5):577-86. [DOI:10.1080/02640410600947090]
20. Bandura A. Self Eflicacy. The Exercise of Control, New York: W H. Freeman & Co Student Success. 1997;333:48461.
21. Bandura A, McClelland DC. Social learning theory. 1977.
22. Hosford RE. Self-as-a-model: A cognitive social learning technique. The Counseling Psychologist. 1980. [DOI:10.1177/001100008000900113]
23. Coulson SE, Adams RD, O'Dwyer NJ, Croxson GR. Use of video self-modelling and implementation intentions following facial nerve paralysis. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation. 2006;13(1). [DOI:10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.1.21349]
24. Bandura A. Toward an agonic theory of the self. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, &D. M. McInerney Eds.,. Self- processes, learning, and enabling human potential:Dynamic new approaches (pp 15 - 49) Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. 2008.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb