دوره 13، شماره 26 - ( 10-1402 )
جلد 13 شماره 26 صفحات 160-141 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
nazari S, najafian F, ramezani S, homayounnia Firouzjah M, barmaki F. The Effect of Visual Illusion and Attention Instructions on Golf Putting Performance and Impact Learning in Children. JRSM 2023; 13 (26) :141-160
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3205-fa.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3205-fa.html
نظری سعید، نجفیان فاطمه، رمضانی شهین، همایون نیا فیروزجاه مرتضی، برمکی فرزانه. تأثیر توهم بینایی و دستورالعمل کانون توجه بر عملکرد و یادگیری ضربه پات گلف کودکان. پژوهش در مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی. 1402; 13 (26) :141-160
سعید نظری1 
، فاطمه نجفیان* 2، شهین رمضانی3 ، مرتضی همایون نیا فیروزجاه4 ، فرزانه برمکی5
، فاطمه نجفیان* 2، شهین رمضانی3 ، مرتضی همایون نیا فیروزجاه4 ، فرزانه برمکی5
1- دکتری رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران
2- کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه الزهراء، تهران، ایران ، f.najafian95@gmail.com
3- کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
4- استادیار گروه آموزش تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
5- دانشجوی کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2- کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه الزهراء، تهران، ایران ، f.najafian95@gmail.com
3- کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
4- استادیار گروه آموزش تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
5- دانشجوی کارشناس ارشد یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده: (1507 مشاهده)
هدف از مطالعه حاضر، بررسی تأثیر توهمات بینایی و دستورالعمل کانون توجه بر عملکرد و یادگیری ضربه پات گلف بود. تعداد 48 دانش‌آموز با دامنه سنی (9-7) سال، به صورت هدفمند از جامعه در دسترس و به صورت تصادفی به چهار گروه (توهم بینایی بزرگ دستورالعمل توجه بیرونی، توهم بینایی بزرگ دستورالعمل توجه درونی، توهم بینایی کوچک دستورالعمل توجه بیرونی، توهم بینایی کوچک دستورالعمل توجه درونی) اختصاص یافتند. پژوهش حاضر، در پنج مرحله مختلف پیش‌آزمون، اکتساب، یادداری، انتقال و تکلیف ثانویه انجام شد. در تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تحلیل واریانس مرکب و آزمون تعقیبی بونفرونی استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که در تمامی مراحل به ویژه تکلیف ثانویه دو گروه توجه بیرونی با هدف ادراک‌شده بزرگ و کوچک، عملکرد بهتری نسبت به سایر گروه‌ها داشتند. این یافته‌ها اهمیت توجه بیرونی و اثر مضاعف و افزایشی آن با توهمات بینایی را نشان داد که ممکن است بستری در جهت مکانیزم‌های یادگیری ضمنی باشد لذا توصیه می‌شود مربیان تربیت‌بدنی از متغیرهای روان‌شناختی (توجه بیرونی و توهمات بینایی) در آموزش مهارت میدانی پات گلف استفاده کنند.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
رفتار حرکتی
دریافت: 1402/3/1 | پذیرش: 1402/9/29 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/9/29 | انتشار: 1402/10/8
دریافت: 1402/3/1 | پذیرش: 1402/9/29 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/9/29 | انتشار: 1402/10/8
فهرست منابع
1. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54A. 2001: 1143-1154. [DOI:10.1080/713756012]
2. Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.2010;63(4): 738-749. [DOI:10.1080/17470210903111839]
3. Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing. 2010. 4.
4. Wulf G, Lauterbach B, Toole T. The learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1999; 70:120-126. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608029]
5. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Fuchs T, Ritter F, Toole T. Attentional focus in complex skill learning. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport. 2000; 71: 229-239. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608903]
6. Zachry T, Wulf G, Mercer J, Bezodis N. Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull. 2005;67(4):304-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.035]
7. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013; 6: 77-104. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728]
8. Lohse KR. The influence of attention on learning and performance: Pre-movement time and accuracy in an isometric force production task. Human Movement Science. 2012; 31: 12-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.001]
9. Wulf G. Attention and motor skill learning. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.2007. [DOI:10.5040/9781492596844]
10. Kal EC, VanderKamp J, Houdijk H. External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human movement science. 2013; 32(4): 527-539. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001]
11. Bell JJ, Hardy J. Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009;21(2):163-177. [DOI:10.1080/10413200902795323]
12. Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Raab M. Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing? Journal of Sports Sciences. 2006; 24:89-99. [DOI:10.1080/02640410500130854]
13. Becker KA, Hung CJ. Attentional focus influences sample entropy in a balancing task. Human Movement Science. 2020 Aug 1;72:102631. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2020.102631]
14. Law JC, Wong TW. Internal focus instruction increases psychological stress with conscious motor processing and deteriorates motor performance in dart throwing. Cognitive Processing.2020: 1-8. [DOI:10.1007/s10339-020-00991-7]
15. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In B. Bruya (Ed), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action.2010; 75-101. [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013840.003.0004]
16. Chauvel G, Wulf G, Maquestiaux F. Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2015; 22(3):717-721. [DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9]
17. Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Proffitt DR. Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychological Science. 2012;23(4): 397-399. [DOI:10.1177/0956797611428810]
18. Marchant DC, Carnegiea E, Wood G, Ellison P. Influence of visual illusion and attentional focusing instruction in motor Performance.International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2018.1441165. [DOI:10.1080/1612197X.2018.1441165]
19. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Cardozo P, Chiviacowsky S. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2017. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204 [DOI:10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204]
20. Agethen M, Krause D. Effects of bandwidth feedback on the automatization of an arm movement sequence. Human Movement Science. 2016; 45:71-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.005]
21. Sherwood DE. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1988; 66(2): 535-542. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.535]
22. Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR. Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2008;15(3):581-585. [DOI:10.3758/PBR.15.3.581]
23. Palmer, Chiviacowsky, Wulf G. Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting.Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 2016; 22(C): 229-232. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009]
24. Cañal-Bruland, R, van der Meer Y, Moerman J. (2016). Can visual illusions be used to facilitate sport skill learning? Journal of motor behavior. 2016;48(5), 285-389. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2015.1113916]
25. Elizabeth A. Sanli Timothy D. What Roles Do Errors Serve in Motor Skill Learning? An Examination of Two Theoretical Predictions, Journal of Motor Behavior. 2014; 46:5:329-337.DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2014.913544. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2014.913544]
26. Stevens D, Anderson DI, O'Dwyer NJ, Williams AM. Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills?. Consciousness and cognition. 2012; 21(3): 1122-1128. [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.014]
27. Wood G, Vine SJ, Wilson MR. The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2013; 75(5): 830-834. [DOI:10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y]
28. Bahmani M, Wulf G, Ghadiri F, Karimi s, Lewthwate R. Enhancing performance expectancies through visual illusions facilitates motor learning in children. Human Movement Science (in press).2017. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.001]
29. Cañal-Bruland R, Müller F, Lach B, Spence C. Auditory contributions to visual anticipation in tennis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018; 36: 100-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.02.001]
30. Chua, L. K., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science, 60, 107-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006]
31. Land WM, Frank C, Schack T. The influence of attentional focuson the development of skill representation in a complex action. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2014; 15: 30-38.doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.006]
32. Tse AC, Fong SS, Wong TW, Masters R. (2017). Analogy motor learning by young children: a study of rope skipping. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017; 17: 152-159. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1214184 [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2016.1214184]
33. Kal E, Winters M, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H, Groet E, Van Bennekom C, Scherder E. Is implicit motor learning preserved after stroke? A systematic review with meta-analysis. 2016; 11(12): e0166376. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166376]
34. Ong NT, Lohse KR, Sze AF, Hodges NJ. Investigating the moderating influence of self-efficacy in an errorless learning protocol. In Journal of sport & exercsise psychology. 2013.
35. Tsetseli M, Zetou E, Vernadakis N, Mountaki F. The attentional focus impact on tennis skills' technique in 10 and under years old players: Implications for real game situations.2018. [DOI:10.14198/jhse.2018.132.15]
36. Allingham E, Wöllner C. Effects of Attentional Focus on Motor Performance and Physiology in a Slow-Motion Violin Bow-Control Task: Evidence for the Constrained Action Hypothesis in Bowed String Technique. Journal of Research in Music Education. 2021. [DOI:10.1177/00224294211034735]
37. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2001; 54:1049-1068. PubMed ID: 11765732 doi:10.1080/713756014. [DOI:10.1080/713756014]
38. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition. 2003; 12(3): 376-402. [DOI:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00005-9]
39. Maquestiaux F, Arexis M, Chauvel G, Ladoy J, Boyer P, Mazerolle M. Ebbinghaus visual illusion: no robust influence on novice golf-putting performance. Psychological research. 2021. 85(3), 1156-1166. [DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01298-0]
40. Lohse KR, Jones M, Healy AF, Sherwood DE. The role of attention in motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014; 143: 930-948. [DOI:10.1037/a0032817]
41. Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP. Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008; 17:335-338. [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.009]
42. Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW. Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement. Biological Psychology.2011; 87(1): 66-73 [DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.004]
43. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54A. 2001: 1143-1154. [DOI:10.1080/713756012]
44. Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.2010;63(4): 738-749. [DOI:10.1080/17470210903111839]
45. Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing. 2010. 4.
46. Wulf G, Lauterbach B, Toole T. The learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1999; 70:120-126. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608029]
47. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Fuchs T, Ritter F, Toole T. Attentional focus in complex skill learning. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport. 2000; 71: 229-239. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608903]
48. Zachry T, Wulf G, Mercer J, Bezodis N. Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull. 2005;67(4):304-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.035]
49. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013; 6: 77-104. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728]
50. Lohse KR. The influence of attention on learning and performance: Pre-movement time and accuracy in an isometric force production task. Human Movement Science. 2012; 31: 12-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.001]
51. Wulf G. Attention and motor skill learning. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.2007. [DOI:10.5040/9781492596844]
52. Kal EC, VanderKamp J, Houdijk H. External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human movement science. 2013; 32(4): 527-539. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001]
53. Bell JJ, Hardy J. Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009;21(2):163-177. [DOI:10.1080/10413200902795323]
54. Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Raab M. Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing? Journal of Sports Sciences. 2006; 24:89-99. [DOI:10.1080/02640410500130854]
55. Becker KA, Hung CJ. Attentional focus influences sample entropy in a balancing task. Human Movement Science. 2020 Aug 1;72:102631. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2020.102631]
56. Law JC, Wong TW. Internal focus instruction increases psychological stress with conscious motor processing and deteriorates motor performance in dart throwing. Cognitive Processing.2020: 1-8. [DOI:10.1007/s10339-020-00991-7]
57. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In B. Bruya (Ed), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action.2010; 75-101. [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013840.003.0004]
58. Chauvel G, Wulf G, Maquestiaux F. Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2015; 22(3):717-721. [DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9]
59. Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Proffitt DR. Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychological Science. 2012;23(4): 397-399. [DOI:10.1177/0956797611428810]
60. Marchant DC, Carnegiea E, Wood G, Ellison P. Influence of visual illusion and attentional focusing instruction in motor Performance.International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2018.1441165. [DOI:10.1080/1612197X.2018.1441165]
61. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Cardozo P, Chiviacowsky S. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2017. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204 [DOI:10.1080/17470218.2016.1276204]
62. Agethen M, Krause D. Effects of bandwidth feedback on the automatization of an arm movement sequence. Human Movement Science. 2016; 45:71-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.005]
63. Sherwood DE. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1988; 66(2): 535-542. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.535]
64. Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR. Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2008;15(3):581-585. [DOI:10.3758/PBR.15.3.581]
65. Palmer, Chiviacowsky, Wulf G. Enhanced expectancies facilitate golf putting.Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 2016; 22(C): 229-232. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.009]
66. Cañal-Bruland, R, van der Meer Y, Moerman J. (2016). Can visual illusions be used to facilitate sport skill learning? Journal of motor behavior. 2016;48(5), 285-389. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2015.1113916]
67. Elizabeth A. Sanli Timothy D. What Roles Do Errors Serve in Motor Skill Learning? An Examination of Two Theoretical Predictions, Journal of Motor Behavior. 2014; 46:5:329-337.DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2014.913544. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2014.913544]
68. Stevens D, Anderson DI, O'Dwyer NJ, Williams AM. Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills?. Consciousness and cognition. 2012; 21(3): 1122-1128. [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.014]
69. Wood G, Vine SJ, Wilson MR. The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2013; 75(5): 830-834. [DOI:10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y]
70. Bahmani M, Wulf G, Ghadiri F, Karimi s, Lewthwate R. Enhancing performance expectancies through visual illusions facilitates motor learning in children. Human Movement Science (in press).2017. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.001]
71. Cañal-Bruland R, Müller F, Lach B, Spence C. Auditory contributions to visual anticipation in tennis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018; 36: 100-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.02.001]
72. Chua, L. K., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science, 60, 107-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006]
73. Land WM, Frank C, Schack T. The influence of attentional focuson the development of skill representation in a complex action. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2014; 15: 30-38.doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.006]
74. Tse AC, Fong SS, Wong TW, Masters R. (2017). Analogy motor learning by young children: a study of rope skipping. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017; 17: 152-159. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1214184 [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2016.1214184]
75. Kal E, Winters M, Van Der Kamp J, Houdijk H, Groet E, Van Bennekom C, Scherder E. Is implicit motor learning preserved after stroke? A systematic review with meta-analysis. 2016; 11(12): e0166376. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166376]
76. Ong NT, Lohse KR, Sze AF, Hodges NJ. Investigating the moderating influence of self-efficacy in an errorless learning protocol. In Journal of sport & exercsise psychology. 2013.
77. Tsetseli M, Zetou E, Vernadakis N, Mountaki F. The attentional focus impact on tennis skills' technique in 10 and under years old players: Implications for real game situations.2018. [DOI:10.14198/jhse.2018.132.15]
78. Allingham E, Wöllner C. Effects of Attentional Focus on Motor Performance and Physiology in a Slow-Motion Violin Bow-Control Task: Evidence for the Constrained Action Hypothesis in Bowed String Technique. Journal of Research in Music Education. 2021. [DOI:10.1177/00224294211034735]
79. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2001; 54:1049-1068. PubMed ID: 11765732 doi:10.1080/713756014. [DOI:10.1080/713756014]
80. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition. 2003; 12(3): 376-402. [DOI:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00005-9]
81. Maquestiaux F, Arexis M, Chauvel G, Ladoy J, Boyer P, Mazerolle M. Ebbinghaus visual illusion: no robust influence on novice golf-putting performance. Psychological research. 2021. 85(3), 1156-1166. [DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01298-0]
82. Lohse KR, Jones M, Healy AF, Sherwood DE. The role of attention in motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014; 143: 930-948. [DOI:10.1037/a0032817]
83. Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP. Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008; 17:335-338. [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.009]
84. Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW. Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement. Biological Psychology.2011; 87(1): 66-73 [DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.004]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
