Volume 5, Issue 4 (12-2018)                   nbr 2018, 5(4): 348-355 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Naderi M. A comparison of linear transect and capture recapture methods results in Iranian Jerboa population density and abundance estimation in Mirabad plains, Shahreza. nbr 2018; 5 (4) :348-355
URL: http://nbr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2760-en.html
, ghnadery@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (4612 Views)

During a period from spring 2008 till fall 2010, Iranian Jerboa population abundance was estimated using distance (linear transect) and capture-recapture methods in the Mirabad plains near Shahreza city in Isfahan Province. In the study period, during the active time of the species except reproduction time, we tried to live-trap, mark, release and recapture individuals based on Schnabel method on different sampling occasions. Simultaneously, we also traversed line transects using motorcycle and spot-light by two observers in different habitat types. We tried to get uniform trapping nights in different lunar nights and different habitat types. The population abundance, using Schnabel and distance methods was estimated to be 226 and 402 individuals, respectively. With regard to the obtained results and species behavior, it seems that distance method yields more precise confidence limits of the estimation compared with capture-recapture method. However, capture-recapture method yields more precise estimates for closed populations because of its more limiting assumptions, but the confidence reliability of abundance estimation of a species depends on the species and its habitat selection behavior completely.                               
                            

Full-Text [PDF 770 kb]   (1555 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Ecology
Received: 2017/02/4 | Revised: 2019/07/20 | Accepted: 2018/09/26 | Published: 2019/03/18 | ePublished: 2019/03/18

References
1. Bailey, N.T.J. 1951. On estimating the size of mobile populations from recapture data. – Biometricka 38: 293-306. [DOI:10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.293]
2. Bailey, N.T.J. 1952. Improvements in the interpretation of recapture data. – J. Animal. Ecol. 21: 120-27. [DOI:10.2307/1913]
3. B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. 1998. British Columbia's wildlife species at risk: Western Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis.
4. Çolak, E., Kıvanç, E. and Yiğit, N. 1994. A study on taxonomic status of Allactaga euphratica Thomas, 1881 and Allactaga williamsi Thomas, 1897 (Rodentia: Dipodidae) in Turkey. – Mammalia 58: 591-600. [DOI:10.1515/mamm.1994.58.4.591]
5. Darvish, J., Hajjar, T., Moghadam Matin, M., Haddad, F. and Akbary Rad., S. 2008. New species of five-Toed Jerboa (Rodentia: Dipodidae, Allactaginae) from North-East Iran. – J. Sci. 19: 103-109.
6. Hemami, M.R., Naderi, G.H., Karami, M. and Mohammadi, S. 2011. Nocturnal activity of Iranian Jerboa Allactaga firouzi (Mammalia: Rodentia: Dipo-didae). – Mammalia 75: 42-57 [DOI:10.1515/mamm.2010.062]
7. Holden, M.E. and Musser, G.G. 2005. Family Dipodidae. – In: Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.A. (eds.), Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 3rd ed. 2: 871-893.
8. Karami, M., Hutterer, R., Benda, P., Siahsarvie, R. and Krystufek, B. 2008. Annotated check-list of mammals of Iran. – Lynx (Praha) 39: 63-102.
9. Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2ed edition. Pearson, p: 620.
10. Lincoln, F.C. 1930. Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns. ‒ U.S. Dept. Agric. Circ. 118: 1-4.
11. MacLeod, J. 1958. The estimation of numbers of mobile insects from low-incidence recapture data. – Trans. Royad Entomol. Soc. London 110: 363-392. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1958.tb00486.x]
12. Naderi, G.h., Hemami, M. and Mohammadi, S. 2011. Investigation of habitat preferences of Iranian jerboa (Allactaga firouzi Womochel 1978), – Mammalia 75: 181-184. [DOI:10.1515/mamm.2011.008]
13. Naderi, Gh, Hemami, M. R., Riazi, B. and Alesheikh, A. 2009. Notes on ecological peculiarities of Iranian Jerboa, Allactaga firouzi Womochel, 1978 (Mammalia: Dipodidae). – Zool. Mid. East 47: 21-28. [DOI:10.1080/09397140.2009.10638343]
14. Parmenter, R.R., Yates, T.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Dunnum, J.L., Franklin, A.B., Friggens, M.T., Lubow, B.C., Miller, M., Olson, G.S., Parmenter, C.A., Pollard, J., Rexstad, E., Shenk, T.M., Stanley, T.R. and White, G.C. 2003. Small-mammal density estimation: a field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators. Ecol. – Monogr. 73: 1-26. [DOI:10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0001:SMDEAF]2.0.CO;2]
15. Seber, G.A.F. 1973. The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffin, London.
16. Shenbrot, G.I. 1991. Subspecific taxonomy revision of the five-toed jerboas, genus Allactaga (Rodentia, Dipodoidea), of the USSR fauna. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the USSR Acaddemy of Science (Leningrad), pp: 42-58.
17. Shenbrot, G.I. 2009. On the conspecifity of Allactaga hotsoni Thomas, 1920 and Allactaga firouzi Womochel, 1978 (Rodentia: Dipodidae). – Mammalia 73: 241-237. [DOI:10.1515/MAMM.2009.043]
18. Shenbrot, G.I., Sokolov, V.E., Heptner, V.G. and Kovalskaya, Yu.M. 1995. Dipodoidea. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.
19. Sullivan, T.P. 1997. Sampling methodology for small mammals. – Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Mimeograph.
20. Sutherland, W. 2011. Ecological Census Techniques. – Cambridge University Press, 431 pp.
21. Ward, S.J., 2000. The efficacy of nest boxes versus spotlighting for detecting feather tail gliders. – Wil. Res. 27: 75-79. [DOI:10.1071/WR99018]
22. Wilson, D.J., Mulvey, R.L., Clarke, D.A. and Reardon, J. 2017. Assessing and comparing population densities and indices of skinks under three predator management regimes. – New Zealand J. Ecol. 41: 84-97.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Nova Biologica Reperta

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb