Volume 6, Issue 2 (8-2019)
Human Information Interaction 2019, 6(2): 48-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
morady K, ghaebi A, karbalaei M. Investigating the Contemporary Views on Information Retrieval and Elucidation of the New View: Semiotics. Human Information Interaction 2019; 6 (2)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2933-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2933-en.html
Abstract: (5036 Views)
Background and Aim: The aim of the study is to investigate the prevailing views in the field of information retrieval in information science (system-oriented, user-oriented and domain-oriented) and to enlighten the new view of "semiotics." The research seeks to answer the following questions: What are the main components of the views in information science? What are the characteristics of the semiotic view and what is its added value compared to other perspectives?
Methods: Researches that have used the concepts, models and theories of semiotics in various fields of information science were searched in the databases of Emerald, Scopus, Google Scholar. The retrieved articles were reviewed with the selection of 23 Articles. The title, abstract and results of the articles as well as the full text of 5 articles associated to the purpose of the research were analyzed via content analysis method.
Results: Findings showed that most of the research in the field was published between 2000 and 2018 by mostly researchers in Denmark. Some articles have explained and defined the concept of information based on the concepts and theories of semiotics and had presented a new view on information science based on the classification, called the semiotic view.
Conclusion: The results showed that system-oriented, user-oriented and domain-oriented views emphasized the document and each of them emphasized an aspect. The semiotic point of view, information is intended as sign and can combine the characteristics of the three views and define the information regardless of the media that carries it and remove the boundaries of the document.
Methods: Researches that have used the concepts, models and theories of semiotics in various fields of information science were searched in the databases of Emerald, Scopus, Google Scholar. The retrieved articles were reviewed with the selection of 23 Articles. The title, abstract and results of the articles as well as the full text of 5 articles associated to the purpose of the research were analyzed via content analysis method.
Results: Findings showed that most of the research in the field was published between 2000 and 2018 by mostly researchers in Denmark. Some articles have explained and defined the concept of information based on the concepts and theories of semiotics and had presented a new view on information science based on the classification, called the semiotic view.
Conclusion: The results showed that system-oriented, user-oriented and domain-oriented views emphasized the document and each of them emphasized an aspect. The semiotic point of view, information is intended as sign and can combine the characteristics of the three views and define the information regardless of the media that carries it and remove the boundaries of the document.
Keywords: System-oriented, User-oriented, Domain-oriented, Semiotics, Information, Information Retrieval.
References
1. Artandi, S. (1973). Information Concepts and Their Utility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24 (4). [DOI:10.1002/asi.4630240403]
2. Atkin, A. (2016). Peirce. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315696409]
3. Barros, C. M. de; Cafe, Lígia, M. A. (2012). Semiotics Studies in the Information Science: Interdisciplinarities Reports. Perspect. ciênc. inf. [online], 17 (3). [DOI:10.1590/S1413-99362012000300003]
4. Belkin, N. J. (1978), Information Concepts for Information Science, Journal of Documentation, 34 (1). [DOI:10.1108/eb026653]
5. Bigdeli, Z; Shahini, Sh. (2014). Complexity and Evolution of Information Concepts and Information Behavior. Human-information interaction, 1 (3). (Persian)
6. Brier, S. (2006). The Foundation of LIS in Information Science and Semiotics. LIBREAS, 1.
7. Chandler, D. (2015). Fundamentals of Semiotics. Translated by Mehdi Parsa, Tehran: Surah Mehr.
8. Friedman, A.; Smiraglia, R. P. (2013). Nodes and Arcs: Concept Map, Semiotics, and Knowledge Organization. Journal of Documentation, 69 (1). [DOI:10.1108/00220411311295315]
9. Heidari, Gh. (1390). Epistemological Assumptions of Scientometrics. Library and Information Science, 1 (53). (Persian)
10. Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and The Socio‐Cognitive Perspective in Information Science. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (4). [DOI:10.1002/asi.10042]
11. Huang, S. (2006). A Semiotic View of Information: Semiotics as a Foundation of LIS Research in Information Behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43 (1). [DOI:10.1002/meet.1450430166]
12. Mai, J. E. (2001). Semiotics and Indexing: An Analysis of the Subject Indexing Process, Journal of Documentation, 57 (5). [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000007095]
13. Mansoorian, Y. (2003). A Review of User-Friendly Research in Web-Based Information Retrieval Studies. Library and Information Science, 3 (23). (Persian)
14. Nöth, W. (2011). Representation and Reference According to Peirce. International Journal of Signs and Semiotics Systems. 1 (2). [DOI:10.4018/ijsss.2011070102]
15. Peirce, C. S., Hartshorne, C.; Weiss, P.; Burks, A. (1960). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
16. Peirce, C. S. (1974). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17. Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18. Raber, D.; Budd, J. M. (2003). Information as Sign: Semiotics and Information Science. Journal of Documentation, 59(5). [DOI:10.1108/00220410310499564]
19. Razavifar, A.; Ghaffari, H. (2011). Pierce's Semiotics in the Light of his Philosophy, Epistemology, and Attitude Toward Pragmatism. Philosophy, 39 (2). (Persian)
20. Rismanbaf, A.; Fattahi, R. (2016). Cognitive Science: Research in Information Science and Science. Tehran: Librarian Publishing. (Persian)
21. Shabani, A.; Soleimanzadeh Najafi, N.; Seyed Hosseini, S.; Azargon, M. (2015). An Analysis of Bigger Hjørland's Views and Opinions in the Field of Knowledge Organization. National Library and Information Organization Studies, 27 (3). (Persian)
22. Stamper, R. K. (1993). A Semiotic Theory of Information and Information Systems. In B. Randell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Joint ICL/University of Newcastle Seminar on the Teaching of Computer Science, Part IX: Information. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
23. Thellefsen, T.; SØrensen, B.; Thellefsen, M. (2011). The Significance-Effect Is a Communicational Effect: Introducing the DynaCom. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (1). [DOI:10.12697/SSS.2011.39.1.07]
24. Thellefsen, T.; Thellefsen, M.; SØrensen, B. (2014). A Pragmatic Semeiotic Perspective on the Concept of Information Need and Its Relevance for Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 40 (4). [DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-213]
25. Thellefsen,T.; Thellefsen, M.; SØrensen, B. (2015). Introducing a Semeiotic Inspired Concept of Information for Library and Information Science-Breaking the Boundaries of Documents. Monist, 3 (1).
26. Thellefsen, T.; Thellefsen, M.; SØrensen, B. (2018). Information as Signs: A Semiotic Analysis of the Information Concept, Determining Its Ontological and Epistemological Foundations. Journal of Documentation, 74 (2). [DOI:10.1108/JD-05-2017-0078]
27. Wikipedia (2017). Semiotics Theory Sanders Peirce. Retrieved from; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotic_theory_of_Charles_Sanders_Peirce
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
