Volume 8, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Human Information Interaction 2021, 8(1): 82-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Narimani H, Tahmasebi Limooni S, ghiasi M. Presenting a Model for the effect of research interactions between the Faculty Members and Students with Librarians on Scientific Outputs: a Grounded Theory approach. Human Information Interaction 2021; 8 (1)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2956-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2956-en.html
Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (4414 Views)
Purpose: The significance of collaboration of librarians and academicians in enhancing the students’ academic success and research capacity has been increasingly recognized by scholars. The purpose of this study is to provide a model of the impact of research interactions between faculty members and students with librarians on scientific products with a grounded theory approach.
Methodology: This is a qualitative approach using grounded theory research method. Data collection was a semi-structured interview using snowball sampling. Twenty interviews were conducted with faculty members of Mazandaran University and experts working at the University. Data analysis was performed in three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding based on which a qualitative research model was designed.
Findings: The results showed that out of a total of 264 open codes identified, 44 were central codes and in conclusion 10 selected codes were identified. A paradigm model including: Improving the research interactions of faculty members and students with librarians in scientific productions as a Axial category and causal conditions (training skills and information literacy, interaction and knowledge experiences), contextual factors (information and research consulting, resources Interventional conditions (research rules and regulations), strategies (evaluation of scientific output, management of research resources) and consequences (increase of scientific production, cost management and teamwork) was set.
Conclusion: Conferring inadequate studies inspecting factors affecting the interactions of faculty members and students with librarians on the scientific products of the University, results of this study will be beneficial in identifying the research priorities of the University and supporting researchers, enabling extensive and challenging research activities and improving research methods
Methodology: This is a qualitative approach using grounded theory research method. Data collection was a semi-structured interview using snowball sampling. Twenty interviews were conducted with faculty members of Mazandaran University and experts working at the University. Data analysis was performed in three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding based on which a qualitative research model was designed.
Findings: The results showed that out of a total of 264 open codes identified, 44 were central codes and in conclusion 10 selected codes were identified. A paradigm model including: Improving the research interactions of faculty members and students with librarians in scientific productions as a Axial category and causal conditions (training skills and information literacy, interaction and knowledge experiences), contextual factors (information and research consulting, resources Interventional conditions (research rules and regulations), strategies (evaluation of scientific output, management of research resources) and consequences (increase of scientific production, cost management and teamwork) was set.
Conclusion: Conferring inadequate studies inspecting factors affecting the interactions of faculty members and students with librarians on the scientific products of the University, results of this study will be beneficial in identifying the research priorities of the University and supporting researchers, enabling extensive and challenging research activities and improving research methods
Keywords: Research Interactions, Scientific Productions, Coding, Grounded Theory, Mazandaran University
References
1. Asemi, A.; Zalzadeh, E. (2012). Information systems with emphasis on library and information systems. Tehran: Ketabdar. (Persian).
2. BeiraghiPanah, E., Askari, A., Naami, A., Rousta, A., (2020). Presenting a local marketing model with emphasis on consumers' attitudes in order to buy Iranian products with a customer information behavior approach. Human Information Interaction, 7(2); 46-58, (Persian).
3. Bagheri Heydari, F. (2016), Effective Factors on Academic Identity of Students (Case Study: Payame Noor, Azad and None-Profit University).Iranian Journal of Culture in the Islamic University, 5 (17), 587-600, (Persian).
4. Bazargan, A. (2011). Introduction to qualitative and mixed methods research. Tehran: Didar. (Persian).
5. Borrego, Á. Jordi A., Cristóbal U., (2018). Librarians as Research Partners: Their Contribution to the Scholarly Endeavour Beyond Library and Information Science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5).
6. Danaeifard, H, Emami, S. (2007). Strategies of Qualitative Research: A Reflection on Grounded Theory. Strategic Management Thought, 1(2).69-97, (Persian).
7. Dehvari, B., Riyahinia, N., Mahmodi Topkanloo, H., (2019). Identification of indigenous knowledge items and presenting the knowledge management model of indigenous medicine in Makran district. Human Information Interaction. 6(1):89-102, (Persian).
8. Ebrami, H. (2008). Cognition of Knowledge. Tehran: ketabdar, (Persian).
9. Farasatkhah, M. (2019). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences with imphasis on "Grounded Theory" (GTM grounded theory). Tehran: Agah Publications. (Persian).
10. Farasatkhah, M. (2016). Qualitative Research Method in Social Sciences. Tehran: Agah Publications, (Persian).
11. Gabbay, L. K.; Shoham, S. (2016), Scholarly communication and academic librarians, Library & Information Science Research 38 , 170–179
12. Gullbekk, S., Westbye, G., Anderson, L.S. (2019). Library Interactions Developing Research-based Teaching and Learning. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education.12(2).
13. Hariri, N., (2016). Principles and Methods of Qualitive Research. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, (Persian).
14. Hassanzadeh, M. (2012). Scientometrics in organizations as a new role for Library and Information Science Professionals. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 4 (66): 195-206, (Persian).
15. Kord,Z. (2021). Investigation of Effective Barriers on Scientific Growth from Perspective of Humanities Students at Lorestan University. Higher Education Letter, 13 (51), 109 -127. (Persian).
16. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba E. G (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Thusand Oaks, CA: Sage. P: 124
17. McBurney, J., Hunt, S., Gyendina, M., Brown, S., Wiggins, B.L., & Nackerud, S. (2020). Library Research Sprints as a Tool to Engage Faculty and Promote Collaboration. Portal - Libraries and the Academy, 20, 305-338.
18. Mohammadian, S. Ismaili Givi, M. And Naghshineh, N. (2016). Identifying and Analyzing the most important factors in Universities Scientific Output Using Neural Network .Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management. 32(1):5-24, (Persian).
19. Moradi Moghadam, H. (2020). "The Role of Libraries in Research: Transformation from a Traditional Role to a New Role in Service Delivery" Vista E-Journal, accessed at https://vista.ir/m/a/moue6, (Persian).
20. Nguyen, T. L., & Tuamsuk, K. (2020). Faculty–librarian administrative structure and collaborative activities supporting teaching and research at Vietnamese universities: A qualitative study. IFLA Journal, 47(2):236-249.
21. Pham, H. T., & Tanner, K. (2014). Collaboration between academics and librarians: A literature review and framework for analysis. Library Review, 63(1/2), 15-45.
22. Rahnama, S., Fattahi, R., Dayani, M.H. (2015).A Survey of the Status and Factors Affecting Librarians’ Communication Skills: A Case Study of Librarians at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(3),875-898. (Persian).
23. Razeghi,N., Ghaedi, M.(2016). A Study of the Factors Influencing the Scientific Productions (A Case Study of Mazandaran University. iran). Journal of Executive management. 8(16), 63-86, (Persian).
24. Ruzbahani M, Riahinia N. (2016). Identifying Credibility Criteria in Scholarly Communication (Reading and Citing) form the Standpoints of Faculty Members of Kharazmi University. Human Information Interaction. 3 (2): 1-11. (Persian).
25. Sarrafzadeh, M. (2016). "Macro Research Data Management: A New Role for Academic Libraries", Information and Communication, 2 (6): 265-272(Persian).
26. Stommel, M., Wills. CE. (2004) clinical research: concepts and principles for advanced practice nurses. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
27. Strauss, A.Corbin J (2011). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods. Translated by Buick Mohammadi. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Persian).
28. Yazdani, F. (2013). Theoretical foundations of e-learning. Tehran: Chapar. (Persian).
29. Zhiyi, S., Li Youngminga, w., Guo .y., Feng F., Hui F., Niu Y., Zheng Y.,(2018). How academic librarians involve and contribute in research activities of universities? A systematic demonstration in practice through comparative studies of research productivities and research impacts. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
