Volume 9, Issue 4 (1-2023)
Human Information Interaction 2023, 9(4): 53-67 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Seddighi A H. Information Architecture of Research Institutes’ Website (Case Study: Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s Website). Human Information Interaction 2023; 9 (4)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3084-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3084-en.html
Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc)
Abstract: (3919 Views)
Purpose: As mission-oriented organizations, research institutes have the task of answering community questions in specialized areas, and should therefore be able to effectively present their outputs to their target users. Achieving such a goal requires the proper use of information architecture principles to properly organize the information platform in which the research institutes interact with their audiences. Therefore, reviewing and evaluating the information architecture of Research Institutes’ websites as their main communication platform with their users is of particular importance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s website based on information architecture.
Methodology: The research method is based on content analysis and case evaluation and is done using direct observations and checklists in March 2022. In this regard, first the components of the information environment, ie the context, content, and user of the website are identified. Then, we check the information architecture subsystems of the website using checklists based on the components of the information environment. The organization system checklist contains 14 main questions, the labeling system checklist contains 32 main questions, the navigation system checklist contains 20 main questions, and finally, the search system checklist contains 41 main questions. The checklists were prepared using the library research method and approved by an expert panel. Excel software is used to collect and analyze data.
Findings: Users of the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s website can be categorized into four groups: researchers and students, science and technology policymakers, librarians and informants, and educational and research institutions. The main content of this website includes reports, books, articles, research projects, information systems, scientific events, training courses, laboratories, and collaborative services. The context of the website is based on service development and delivery in the areas of knowledge management, scientific and technological information management, dissemination of information science and technology, supporting science and technology policymakers, Publicizing the use of information technology, cooperating with universities and research institutes, and supporting research in the field of information science and technology. The results of the checklists indicate the score of this website for the organization system, the labeling system, the navigation system, and the search system as 67.6%, 68.4%, 65.4%, and 34.8%, respectively.
Conclusion: The status of the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s website is assessed as good in terms of the organization system, the labeling system, and the navigation system, and poor in terms of the search system. The use of an audience-oriented organization plan in the website organization system, the use of index labels in the form of unique entities in the website labeling system, and the use of a main navigation bar with an integrated and similar design in the website navigation system are among the strengths of the website information architecture design. On the other hand, according to the research findings, to improve the search system, it is necessary to pay attention to features such as “correcting spelling errors in the input query”, “highlighting the input query in the retrieved results”, “adding logical operators to the search system”, “searching metadata”, “sorting results in alphabetical and chronological order”, and “adding search filters such as subject and year”.
Methodology: The research method is based on content analysis and case evaluation and is done using direct observations and checklists in March 2022. In this regard, first the components of the information environment, ie the context, content, and user of the website are identified. Then, we check the information architecture subsystems of the website using checklists based on the components of the information environment. The organization system checklist contains 14 main questions, the labeling system checklist contains 32 main questions, the navigation system checklist contains 20 main questions, and finally, the search system checklist contains 41 main questions. The checklists were prepared using the library research method and approved by an expert panel. Excel software is used to collect and analyze data.
Findings: Users of the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s website can be categorized into four groups: researchers and students, science and technology policymakers, librarians and informants, and educational and research institutions. The main content of this website includes reports, books, articles, research projects, information systems, scientific events, training courses, laboratories, and collaborative services. The context of the website is based on service development and delivery in the areas of knowledge management, scientific and technological information management, dissemination of information science and technology, supporting science and technology policymakers, Publicizing the use of information technology, cooperating with universities and research institutes, and supporting research in the field of information science and technology. The results of the checklists indicate the score of this website for the organization system, the labeling system, the navigation system, and the search system as 67.6%, 68.4%, 65.4%, and 34.8%, respectively.
Conclusion: The status of the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology’s website is assessed as good in terms of the organization system, the labeling system, and the navigation system, and poor in terms of the search system. The use of an audience-oriented organization plan in the website organization system, the use of index labels in the form of unique entities in the website labeling system, and the use of a main navigation bar with an integrated and similar design in the website navigation system are among the strengths of the website information architecture design. On the other hand, according to the research findings, to improve the search system, it is necessary to pay attention to features such as “correcting spelling errors in the input query”, “highlighting the input query in the retrieved results”, “adding logical operators to the search system”, “searching metadata”, “sorting results in alphabetical and chronological order”, and “adding search filters such as subject and year”.
Keywords: Information Architecture, Website Evaluation, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Tech-nology, Information Technology.
References
1. Aranyi, G., Van Schaik, P., & Barker, P. (2012). Using think-aloud and psychometrics to explore users' experience with a news web site. Interacting with Computers, 24(2), 69-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.01.001]
2. Babaei, P., & Seddighi, A. H. (2020). Evaluating the Architecture of Ketabak Website from an In-formation Architecture Perspective. Library and Information Sciences, 23(2), 86-116. [In Persian]
3. Buehler, E., Easley, W., Poole, A., & Hurst, A. (2016). Accessibility barriers to online education for young adults with intellectual disabilities. In Proceedings of the 13th Web for All Conference 2016 (pp. 1-10). [DOI:10.1145/2899475.2899481]
4. Communications Regulatory Authority of the I.R. of Iran. (2021). ICT sector statistics and infor-mation. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://opendata.cra.ir/Dashboard/96954f32-1b4c-4cb2-a18b-e8c986288bb6
5. Daniali, S., & Seddighi, A. H. (2021). Information Architecture Evaluation of University of Tehran Website. Human Information Interaction, 8(2), 1-11. [In Persian]
6. Dekkers, T., Melles, M., Vehmeijer, S. B. W., & de Ridder, H. (2021). Effects of Information Architec-ture on the Effectiveness and User Experience of Web-Based Patient Education in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Online Randomized Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3):e15846, 1-22. [DOI:10.2196/15846] [PMID] []
7. Dillon, A., & Turnbull, D. (2005). Information Ar-chitecture. In M. A. Drake (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
8. Library and Information Science. New York: Tay-lor & Francis.
9. Garett, R., Chiu, J., Zhang, L., & Young, S. D. (2016). A Literature Review: Website Design and User Engagement. Online journal of communica-tion and media technologies, 6(3), 1-14. [DOI:10.29333/ojcmt/2556]
10. GhaviDel, S., & Seddighi, A.H. (2020). Organiza-tional Information Architecture Meta-Method for Organizational Website Case study: Central Insur-ance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Human In-formation Interaction, 7(2), 32-45. [In Persian]
11. Gullikson, S., Blades, R., Bragdon, M., McKibbon, S., Sparling, M., & Toms, E. G. (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic web site usability. The Electronic Library, 17(5), 293-304. [DOI:10.1108/02640479910330714]
12. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology. (2009). Statute of Iranian Re-search Institute for Information Science and Tech-nology. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://en.irandoc.ac.ir/about/statute
13. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology. (2016). Strategic Plan of Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology 2016-2020. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://en.irandoc.ac.ir/about/strategic-plan
14. Kim, S., & Stoel, L. 2004. Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(2), 109-117. [DOI:10.1016/S0969-6989(03)00010-9]
15. Leinonen, T., Purma, J., Poldoja, H., & Toikkanen, T. (2010). Information architecture and design solutions scaffolding authoring of open education-al resources. IEEE Transactions on Learning Tech-nologies, 3(2), 116-128. [DOI:10.1109/TLT.2010.2]
16. Lin, S., Ali, I., & Wilson, G. (2020). Ten quick tips for making things findable. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(12):e1008469, 1-10. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008469] [PMID] []
17. Ministry of Information and Communications Technology of Iran. (2014). Iran's ICT indicators monitoring system. Proportion of higher education centers with internet access. Retrieved December 22, 2019, from https://mis.ito.gov.ir/higher-education
18. Ministry of Information and Communications Technology of Iran. (2017). Iran's ICT indicators monitoring system. ICT Use. Retrieved December 22, 2019, from https://mis.ito.gov.ir/web/guest/ict-use
19. Morovati, M., & Seddighi, A. H. (2020). Evaluation of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Website Based on Information Architecture in 2019. Health Information Management, 16(6), 308-313. [In Persian]
20. Moya, G. B. A., Suri, D. Z., López, K. M. A. (2021). Information Architecture Proposal for a Science, Technology and Environment Web Page in Villa Clara, Cuba. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 6(4), 93-100. [DOI:10.11648/j.ijics.20210604.12]
21. Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2012). What do users really care about? A comparison of usability problems found by users and experts on highly interactive websites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Confer-ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012 (pp. 2107-2116). [DOI:10.1145/2207676.2208363]
22. Pinho, C., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2018). Web portals as tools to support information manage-ment in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Infor-mation Management, 41, 80-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.04.002]
23. Resnick, M. L., & Sanchez, J. (2004). Effects of organizational scheme and labeling on task per-formance in product-centered and user-centered retail web sites. Human factors, 46(1), 104-117. [DOI:10.1518/hfes.46.1.104.30390] [PMID]
24. Sajedinejad, A., & Seddighi, A. H. (2019). A Study of the Development of Information Science Man-agement in the Field of E-government: A Case Study of Systems of Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc). Iranian Journal of Information Management, 5(1), 40-60.
25. Seddighi, A. H. (2021). An Information Architec-ture Evaluation Framework for Websites. Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 36(4), 995-1030. [In Persian] [DOI:10.52547/jipm.36.4.995]
26. Shrestha, D., Wenan, T., Rajkarnikar, N., Shrestha, D., & Jeong, S. R. (2021). Analysis and Design Recommendations for Nepal Tourism Website Based on User Perspective. In S. Smys, R. Pal-anisamy, Á. Rocha, & G. N. Beligiannis (Eds.), Computer Networks and Inventive Communica-tion Technologies (pp. 29-48). Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technolo-gies, vol 58. Springer, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-9647-6_3]
27. Singla, B. S., & Aggarwal, H. (2020). Effect of In-formation Architecture on the Usability of a Uni-versity Website: A Comparative Study of Selected Websites of Punjab (India). International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 11(1), 38-52. [DOI:10.4018/IJDST.2020010104]
28. Statistical Centre of Iran. (2018). Iran Statistical Yearbook 2017-2018. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
